Refine
Institute
Has Fulltext
- no (18)
Document Type
- Article (18) (remove)
Keywords
- Empirical process (2)
- Goodness-of-fit test (2)
- Independence test (2)
- Paired sample (2)
- Parametric bootstrap (2)
- likelihood ratio test (2)
- not identically distributed (2)
- Bahadur efficiency (1)
- Bootstrap (1)
- Bootstrapping (1)
- Brownian Pillow (1)
- Categorial variable (1)
- Collective risk model (1)
- Concomitant (1)
- Coverage probability (1)
- Cramér-von-Mises statistic (1)
- Cramér-von-Mises test (1)
- Crámer–von-Mises distance (1)
- Equivalence test (1)
- Functional Delta Method (1)
- Gamma distribution (1)
- Goodness-of-fit tests for uniformity (1)
- Hadamard differentiability (1)
- Hoeffding-Blum-Kiefer-Rosenblatt independence test (1)
- Hotelling’s T² test (1)
- Incomplete data (1)
- Integrated empirical distribution (survival) function (1)
- Kernel density estimator (1)
- Length of confidence intervals (1)
- Marginal homogeneity test (1)
- Multi-sample problem (1)
- Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms (1)
- Pitman efficiency (1)
- Resampling test (1)
- Vapnik–Čhervonenkis class (1)
- Volume of confidence regions (1)
- Wilcoxon tests (1)
- allocation (1)
- asymptotic relative efficiency (1)
- bootstrap (1)
- central symmetry test (1)
- complete block symmetry (1)
- conditional excess distribution (1)
- conditional expectation principle (1)
- confidence interval (1)
- covariance principle (1)
- exchangeability test (1)
- forecast (1)
- functional data (1)
- goodness-of-fit test (1)
- huge dimensional data (1)
- independence test (1)
- multinomial distribution (1)
- multivariate normal distribution (1)
- portfolio risk (1)
- random effects (1)
- random effects meta-regression model (1)
- separable Hilbert space (1)
- uniformly most powerful invariant test (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (18)
The efficiency concepts of Bahadur and Pitman are used to compare the Wilcoxon tests in paired and independent survey samples. A comparison through the length of corresponding confidence intervals is also done. Simple conditions characterizing the dominance of a procedure are derived. Statistical tests for checking these conditions are suggested and discussed.
In a special paired sample case, Hotelling’s T² test based on the differences of the paired random vectors is the likelihood ratio test for testing the hypothesis that the paired random vectors have the same mean; with respect to a special group of affine linear transformations it is the uniformly most powerful invariant test for the general alternative of a difference in mean. We present an elementary straightforward proof of this result. The likelihood ratio test for testing the hypothesis that the covariance structure is of the assumed special form is derived and discussed. Applications to real data are given.
The established Hoeffding-Blum-Kiefer-Rosenblatt independence test statistic is investigated for partly not identically distributed data. Surprisingly, it turns out that the statistic has the well-known distribution-free limiting null distribution of the classical criterion under standard regularity conditions. An application is testing goodness-of-fit for the regression function in a non parametric random effects meta-regression model, where the consistency is obtained as well. Simulations investigate size and power of the approach for small and moderate sample sizes. A real data example based on clinical trials illustrates how the test can be used in applications.
The paper deals with an asymptotic relative efficiency concept for confidence regions of multidimensional parameters that is based on the expected volumes of the confidence regions. Under standard conditions the asymptotic relative efficiencies of confidence regions are seen to be certain powers of the ratio of the limits of the expected volumes. These limits are explicitly derived for confidence regions associated with certain plugin estimators, likelihood ratio tests and Wald tests. Under regularity conditions, the asymptotic relative efficiency of each of these procedures with respect to each one of its competitors is equal to 1. The results are applied to multivariate normal distributions and multinomial distributions in a fairly general setting.
Let X₁,…,Xₙ be independent and identically distributed random variables with distribution F. Assuming that there are measurable functions f:R²→R and g:R²→R characterizing a family F of distributions on the Borel sets of R in the way that the random variables f(X₁,X₂),g(X₁,X₂) are independent, if and only if F∈F, we propose to treat the testing problem H:F∈F,K:F∉F by applying a consistent nonparametric independence test to the bivariate sample variables (f(Xᵢ,Xⱼ),g(Xᵢ,Xⱼ)),1⩽i,j⩽n,i≠j. A parametric bootstrap procedure needed to get critical values is shown to work. The consistency of the test is discussed. The power performance of the procedure is compared with that of the classical tests of Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Cramér–von Mises in the special cases where F is the family of gamma distributions or the family of inverse Gaussian distributions.
Hotelling’s T² tests in paired and independent survey samples are compared using the traditional asymptotic efficiency concepts of Hodges–Lehmann, Bahadur and Pitman, as well as through criteria based on the volumes of corresponding confidence regions. Conditions characterizing the superiority of a procedure are given in terms of population canonical correlation type coefficients. Statistical tests for checking these conditions are developed. Test statistics based on the eigenvalues of a symmetrized sample cross-covariance matrix are suggested, as well as test statistics based on sample canonical correlation type coefficients.