Fachbereich Energietechnik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (27) (remove)
Institute
Has Fulltext
- no (27)
Document Type
- Article (11)
- Conference Proceeding (8)
- Book (5)
- Part of a Book (3)
Keywords
- Seismic design (2)
- Change Management (1)
- Components (1)
- Corporate Culture (1)
- Design examples (1)
- Diversity Management (1)
- Earthquake (1)
- Emilia-Romagna earthquake (1)
- Empirical consequence curves (1)
- Empirical fragility functions (1)
- Engineering (1)
- Eurocode 8 (1)
- Gust wind response (1)
- In-plane (1)
- Industrial units (1)
- Innovation Management (1)
- Isolation (1)
- Out-of-plane (1)
- PBEE (1)
- Precast buildings (1)
- Pushover analysis (1)
- Response spectrum (1)
- Seismic (1)
- Silos (1)
- Spectral analysis (1)
- Tanks (1)
- Wind turbulence (1)
- concentrating collector (1)
- point-focussing system (1)
- raytracing (1)
- solar process heat (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (27)
The chapter initially provides a summary of the contents of Eurocode 8, its aim being to offer both to the students and to practising engineers an easy introduction into the calculation and dimensioning procedures of this earthquake code. Specifically, the general rules for earthquake-resistant structures, the definition of design response spectra taking behaviour and importance factors into account, the application of linear and non-linear calculation methods and the structural safety verifications at the serviceability and ultimate limit state are presented. The application of linear and non-linear calculation methods and corresponding seismic design rules is demonstrated on practical examples for reinforced concrete, steel and masonry buildings. Furthermore, the seismic assessment of existing buildings is discussed and illustrated on the example of a typical historical masonry building in Italy. The examples are worked out in detail and each step of the design process, from the preliminary analysis to the final design, is explained in detail.
Diversity is increasingly being addressed as an innovation-promoting factor. For this reason, companies and institutions tackle the integration of a diversity management approach that enables a heterogenic perspective on innovation development. However, system-theoretical frameworks state that the implementation of diversity measures that are not tailored to the needs of the organization often leads to a rejection or reactivity with regard to the management approach. In this context, especially organizations, which are characterized by a specific hierarchical structure, a dominant habitus or specialist culture, must face the challenge of realizing a sustainable change of the corporate culture that sets the basis for implementing diversity management approaches. The presented research project focuses on analyzing the situation in a huge scientific collaborative project - so called Cluster of Excellence (CoE) - with the aim to implement a diversity - and innovation management strategy. Considering the influencing determinants, the CoE is characterized by its embeddedness in the scientific system, a complex organizational structure, and a high fluctuation rate. The paper presents a systemic approach of reflecting these factors in order to develop a diversity- and innovation management strategy. In this frame, the results of a quantitative survey of CoE employees and derived mindset-types are presented. The results show a need for taking different mindset-types into account, to be able to develop a tailored management strategy. The aim of the project is to give recommendations for developing a sustainable management concept that promotes both diversity and innovation by drawing on the persisting mindsets of organization members while reflecting top down as well as bottom up factors of implementation processes as well as the psychology of change. This paper addresses all who are concerned with the management of human resources in innovation processes and are striving for a cultural change within the framework of complex organizations.