Fachbereich Energietechnik
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (561)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (32)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (26)
- Nowum-Energy (18)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (15)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (14)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (4)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (3)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (2)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (561) (remove)
Language
- English (561) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (355)
- Conference Proceeding (158)
- Part of a Book (25)
- Book (8)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (7)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Other (2)
- Talk (2)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- Earthquake (5)
- Diversity Management (4)
- Energy storage (4)
- Power plants (4)
- Seismic design (4)
- Associated liquids (3)
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
- Out-of-plane load (3)
- Seismic loading (3)
Like all preceding transformations of the manufacturing industry, the large-scale usage of production data will reshape the role of humans within the sociotechnical production ecosystem. To ensure that this transformation creates work systems in which employees are empowered, productive, healthy, and motivated, the transformation must be guided by principles of and research on human-centered work design. Specifically, measures must be taken at all levels of work design, ranging from (1) the work tasks to (2) the working conditions to (3) the organizational level and (4) the supra-organizational level. We present selected research across all four levels that showcase the opportunities and requirements that surface when striving for human-centered work design for the Internet of Production (IoP). (1) On the work task level, we illustrate the user-centered design of human-robot collaboration (HRC) and process planning in the composite industry as well as user-centered design factors for cognitive assistance systems. (2) On the working conditions level, we present a newly developed framework for the classification of HRC workplaces. (3) Moving to the organizational level, we show how corporate data can be used to facilitate best practice sharing in production networks, and we discuss the implications of the IoP for new leadership models. Finally, (4) on the supra-organizational level, we examine overarching ethical dimensions, investigating, e.g., how the new work contexts affect our understanding of responsibility and normative values such as autonomy and privacy. Overall, these interdisciplinary research perspectives highlight the importance and necessary scope of considering the human factor in the IoP.
Digital Shadows as the aggregation, linkage and abstraction of data relating to physical objects are a central vision for the future of production. However, the majority of current research takes a technocentric approach, in which the human actors in production play a minor role. Here, the authors present an alternative anthropocentric perspective that highlights the potential and main challenges of extending the concept of Digital Shadows to humans. Following future research methodology, three prospections that illustrate use cases for Human Digital Shadows across organizational and hierarchical levels are developed: human-robot collaboration for manual work, decision support and work organization, as well as human resource management. Potentials and challenges are identified using separate SWOT analyses for the three prospections and common themes are emphasized in a concluding discussion.
The 2nd edition of the lightning risk management
standard (IEC 62305-2) considers structures, which may
endanger environment. In these cases, the loss is not limited to
the structure itself, which is valid for usual structures. In the past
(Edition 1) this danger was simply taken into account by a special
hazard factor, multiplying the existing risk for the structure with
a number. Now, in the edition 2, we add to the risk for the
structure itself a “second risk” due to the losses outside the
structure. The losses outside can be treated independently from
what occurs inside. This is a major advantage to analyze the risk
for sensitive structures, like chemical plants, nuclear plants, or
structures containing explosives, etc. In this paper, the existing
procedure given by the European version EN 62305-2 Ed.2 is
further developed and applied to a few structures.