Fachbereich Energietechnik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (3)
- 2023 (11)
- 2022 (34)
- 2021 (19)
- 2020 (35)
- 2019 (27)
- 2018 (22)
- 2017 (27)
- 2016 (16)
- 2015 (23)
- 2014 (40)
- 2013 (34)
- 2012 (20)
- 2011 (28)
- 2010 (35)
- 2009 (30)
- 2008 (27)
- 2007 (23)
- 2006 (29)
- 2005 (36)
- 2004 (31)
- 2003 (16)
- 2002 (27)
- 2001 (24)
- 2000 (33)
- 1999 (28)
- 1998 (28)
- 1997 (31)
- 1996 (44)
- 1995 (24)
- 1994 (30)
- 1993 (23)
- 1992 (17)
- 1991 (11)
- 1990 (11)
- 1989 (16)
- 1988 (16)
- 1987 (20)
- 1986 (20)
- 1985 (16)
- 1984 (14)
- 1983 (14)
- 1982 (10)
- 1981 (14)
- 1980 (7)
- 1979 (9)
- 1978 (3)
- 1977 (3)
- 1976 (1)
- 1975 (4)
- 1974 (1)
- 1973 (1)
- 1972 (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (1067)
- Nowum-Energy (55)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (42)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (26)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (16)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (14)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (5)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (5)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (4)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (3)
Has Fulltext
- no (1067) (remove)
Language
- English (562)
- German (502)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Dutch (1)
- Spanish (1)
Document Type
- Article (598)
- Conference Proceeding (226)
- Book (126)
- Part of a Book (83)
- Doctoral Thesis (10)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (7)
- Report (7)
- Other (4)
- Talk (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Keywords
- Earthquake (5)
- Diversity Management (4)
- Energy storage (4)
- Power plants (4)
- Seismic design (4)
- Associated liquids (3)
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
- INODIS (3)
- Out-of-plane load (3)
Die neue Welt
(1999)
Die künftige deutsche Blitzschutznormung (2/3) – Reihe DIN EN 62305:2006 – Teil 2: Risikomanagement
(2006)
Die Anfertigung wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten und ihre Präsentation - ein komprimierter Einstieg
(1999)
Development of open educational resources for renewable energy and the energy transition process
(2021)
The dissemination of knowledge about renewable energies is understood as a social task with the highest topicality. The transfer of teaching content on renewable energies into digital open educational resources offers the opportunity to significantly accelerate the implementation of the energy transition. Thus, in the here presented project six German universities create open educational resources for the energy transition. These materials are available to the public on the internet under a free license. So far there has been no publicly accessible, editable media that cover entire learning units about renewable energies extensively and in high technical quality. Thus, in this project, the content that remains up-to-date for a longer period is appropriately prepared in terms of media didactics. The materials enable lecturers to provide students with in-depth training about technologies for the energy transition. In a particular way, the created material is also suitable for making the general public knowledgeable about the energy transition with scientifically based material.
In this work, three patent pending calibration methods for heliostat fields of central receiver systems (CRS) developed by the Solar-Institut Jülich (SIJ) of the FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences are presented. The calibration methods can either operate in a combined mode or in stand-alone mode. The first calibration method, method A, foresees that a camera matrix is placed into the receiver plane where it is subjected to concentrated solar irradiance during a measurement process. The second calibration method, method B, uses an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) such as a quadrocopter to automatically fly into the reflected solar irradiance cross-section of one or more heliostats (two variants of method B were tested). The third calibration method, method C, foresees a stereo central camera or multiple stereo cameras installed e.g. on the solar tower whereby the orientations of the heliostats are calculated from the location detection of spherical red markers attached to the heliostats. The most accurate method is method A which has a mean accuracy of 0.17 mrad. The mean accuracy of method B variant 1 is 1.36 mrad and of variant 2 is 1.73 mrad. Method C has a mean accuracy of 15.07 mrad. For method B there is great potential regarding improving the measurement accuracy. For method C the collected data was not sufficient for determining whether or not there is potential for improving the accuracy.