Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (18) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (8)
- Conference Proceeding (7)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (18) (remove)
Keywords
- Associated liquids (2)
- Power plants (2)
- Android (1)
- Brake set-up (1)
- Braking curves (1)
- Building Automation (1)
- CO2 (1)
- CO2 emission reduction targets (1)
- Carbon Dioxide (1)
- Cost function (1)
- Decision theory (1)
- Digital triage (1)
- District data model (1)
- District energy planning platform (1)
- Driver assistance system (1)
- Driving cycle recognition (1)
- ECMS (1)
- Education (1)
- Electrochemistry (1)
- Energy Disaggregation (1)
- Energy management strategies (1)
- Energy storage (1)
- Energy system planning (1)
- Freight rail (1)
- Home Assistant (1)
- Home Automation Platform (1)
- Human factors (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Multi-objective optimization (1)
- Open Source (1)
- Path planning (1)
- Predictive battery discharge (1)
- Renewable energy integration (1)
- Shunting (1)
- Smart Building (1)
- Triage-app (1)
- adaptive systems (1)
- artificial intelligence (1)
- assistance system (1)
- fuel cell vehicle (1)
- gamification (1)
- intelligent control (1)
- intelligent energy management (1)
- machine learning (1)
- manufacturing (1)
- optimization system (1)
Institute
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (18) (remove)
High aerodynamic efficiency requires propellers with high aspect ratios, while propeller sweep potentially reduces noise. Propeller sweep and high aspect ratios increase elasticity and coupling of structural mechanics and aerodynamics, affecting the propeller performance and noise. Therefore, this paper analyzes the influence of elasticity on forward-swept, backward-swept, and unswept propellers in hover conditions. A reduced-order blade element momentum approach is coupled with a one-dimensional Timoshenko beam theory and Farassat's formulation 1A. The results of the aeroelastic simulation are used as input for the aeroacoustic calculation. The analysis shows that elasticity influences noise radiation because thickness and loading noise respond differently to deformations. In the case of the backward-swept propeller, the location of the maximum sound pressure level shifts forward by 0.5 °, while in the case of the forward-swept propeller, it shifts backward by 0.5 °. Therefore, aeroacoustic optimization requires the consideration of propeller deformation.