Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (132) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (75)
- Conference Proceeding (43)
- Part of a Book (9)
- Other (2)
- Poster (2)
- Book (1)
Language
- English (132) (remove)
Keywords
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Energy storage (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
- Biocomposites (2)
- Chemometrics (2)
- Digital Twin (2)
- Earthquake (2)
- Electricity generation (2)
- Gamification (2)
- Heparin (2)
- IO-Link (2)
- NMR spectroscopy (2)
- Natural fibres (2)
- Polymer-matrix composites (2)
- Power plants (2)
- Seismic design (2)
- Seismic loading (2)
- Solar thermal technologies (2)
- Stress concentrations (2)
- biosensors (2)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (42)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (32)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (27)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (16)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (14)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (14)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (14)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (12)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (10)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (10)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (10)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (7)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (6)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (4)
- FH Aachen (1)
- IMP - Institut für Mikrowellen- und Plasmatechnik (1)
- Nowum-Energy (1)
This paper compares several blade element theory (BET) method-based propeller simulation tools, including an evaluation against static propeller ground tests and high-fidelity Reynolds-Average Navier Stokes (RANS) simulations. Two proprietary propeller geometries for paraglider applications are analysed in static and flight conditions. The RANS simulations are validated with the static test data and used as a reference for comparing the BET in flight conditions. The comparison includes the analysis of varying 2D aerodynamic airfoil parameters and different induced velocity calculation methods. The evaluation of the BET propeller simulation tools shows the strength of the BET tools compared to RANS simulations. The RANS simulations underpredict static experimental data within 10% relative error, while appropriate BET tools overpredict the RANS results by 15–20% relative error. A variation in 2D aerodynamic data depicts the need for highly accurate 2D data for accurate BET results. The nonlinear BET coupled with XFOIL for the 2D aerodynamic data matches best with RANS in static operation and flight conditions. The novel BET tool PropCODE combines both approaches and offers further correction models for highly accurate static and flight condition results.