Refine
Year of publication
- 2015 (176) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (61)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (35)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (32)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (28)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (24)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (22)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (16)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (12)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (10)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (10)
Language
- English (176) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (83)
- Conference Proceeding (71)
- Part of a Book (17)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Patent (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- Attitude dynamics (1)
- Booster Station (1)
- Carsharing (1)
- Charging stations (1)
- Discrete Optimisation (1)
- Discrete Optimization (1)
- E-carsharing (1)
- E-mobility (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Electrical vehicle (1)
Cheap does not imply cost-effective -- this is rule number one of zeitgeisty system design. The initial investment accounts only for a small portion of the lifecycle costs of a technical system. In fluid systems, about ninety percent of the total costs are caused by other factors like power consumption and maintenance. With modern optimization methods, it is already possible to plan an optimal technical system considering multiple objectives. In this paper, we focus on an often neglected contribution to the lifecycle costs: downtime costs due to spontaneous failures. Consequently, availability becomes an issue.