Article
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (3226) (remove)
Language
- English (3226) (remove)
Keywords
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (7)
- avalanche (5)
- Earthquake (4)
- FEM (4)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (4)
- LAPS (4)
- biosensors (4)
- field-effect sensor (4)
- frequency mixing magnetic detection (4)
- CellDrum (3)
- Heparin (3)
- Label-free detection (3)
- additive manufacturing (3)
- capacitive field-effect sensor (3)
- hydrogen peroxide (3)
- magnetic nanoparticles (3)
- shakedown analysis (3)
- snow (3)
- tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) (3)
- Acyl-amino acids (2)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (1343)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (501)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (466)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (408)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (401)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (360)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (247)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (147)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (106)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (68)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (43)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (27)
- Sonstiges (21)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (20)
- Freshman Institute (17)
- Nowum-Energy (16)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (15)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (12)
- Fachbereich Architektur (9)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (5)
Planning the layout and operation of a technical system is a common task
for an engineer. Typically, the workflow is divided into consecutive stages: First,
the engineer designs the layout of the system, with the help of his experience or of
heuristic methods. Secondly, he finds a control strategy which is often optimized
by simulation. This usually results in a good operating of an unquestioned sys-
tem topology. In contrast, we apply Operations Research (OR) methods to find a
cost-optimal solution for both stages simultaneously via mixed integer program-
ming (MILP). Technical Operations Research (TOR) allows one to find a provable
global optimal solution within the model formulation. However, the modeling error
due to the abstraction of physical reality remains unknown. We address this ubiq-
uitous problem of OR methods by comparing our computational results with mea-
surements in a test rig. For a practical test case we compute a topology and control
strategy via MILP and verify that the objectives are met up to a deviation of 8.7%.