Article
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (700) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (700) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (700) (remove)
Keywords
- Datenschutz (2)
- Datenschutzgrundverordnung (2)
- rebound-effect (2)
- sustainability (2)
- Atomausstieg (1)
- Bank-issued Warrants (1)
- Brands (1)
- Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1)
- Change (1)
- Clinical decision support systems (1)
- Consensus (1)
- Discourse ethics (1)
- Disposition Effect (1)
- Europäische Energiepolitik (1)
- Explainability (1)
- Feature selection (1)
- Finland (1)
- Germany (1)
- Human Development Index (1)
- Individual Investors (1)
- Informationstechnik (1)
- Instructional design (1)
- Justice (1)
- Kernenergie (1)
- Latvia (1)
- Luxury (1)
- Measurement models (1)
- Measurement uncertainty (1)
- Medical AI (1)
- Modelling (1)
- Negative Feedback Trading (1)
- Normative standards (1)
- Operations (1)
- Rechtsgebiet (1)
- Requirements prioritization (1)
- Requirements relations (1)
- SSE) JEL : O33 (1)
- Schadensersatz (1)
- Tool support (1)
- Trading Behavior (1)
- automotive (1)
- business culture (1)
- change (1)
- climate change (1)
- corporate sustainability (1)
- critical (1)
- digital twin (1)
- efficiency side-effects (1)
- entrepreneurship education (1)
- eye movement modelling examples (1)
- grey energy (1)
- industry 4.0 (1)
- jevons paradox (1)
- literature (1)
- management (1)
- marketing (1)
- motivation (1)
- resource abundance (1)
- review (1)
- socio-economic welfare (1)
- systematic (1)
- video learning (1)
Die Rechtsfigur der gemeinsamen Verantwortlichkeit beschäftigt die datenschutzrechtliche Literatur seit Langem. Die Bestimmung der Verantwortlichkeit bei arbeitsteiligen Verarbeitungsverfahren, welche vor allem bei heutigen Plattformdiensten üblich sind, ist komplex: Stets sind mehrere Akteure beteiligt und in der Regel werden durch die Handlung eines Beteiligten mehrere Verarbeitungsschritte ausgelöst. Nun hat sich der EuGH in einem in mehrfacher Hinsicht bemerkenswerten Urteil geäußert.
With a steady increase of regulatory requirements for business processes, automation support of compliance management is a field garnering increasing attention in Information Systems research. Several approaches have been developed to support compliance checking of process models. One major challenge for such approaches is their ability to handle different modeling techniques and compliance rules in order to enable widespread adoption and application. Applying a structured literature search strategy, we reflect and discuss compliance-checking approaches in order to provide an insight into their generalizability and evaluation. The results imply that current approaches mainly focus on special modeling techniques and/or a restricted set of types of compliance rules. Most approaches abstain from real-world evaluation which raises the question of their practical applicability. Referring to the search results, we propose a roadmap for further research in model-based business process compliance checking.