Conference Proceeding
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (286)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (226)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (198)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (188)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (164)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (150)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (114)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (103)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (59)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (54)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (44)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (41)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (34)
- Nowum-Energy (22)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (17)
- Fachbereich Architektur (13)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (8)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (3)
- IaAM - Institut für angewandte Automation und Mechatronik (3)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (2)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (2)
- Verwaltung (2)
- Digitalisierung in Studium & Lehre (1)
- FH Aachen (1)
- Freshman Institute (1)
- Kommission für Planung und Finanzen (1)
- Senat (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (1413) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (1413) (remove)
Keywords
- Enterprise Architecture (5)
- Gamification (5)
- Energy storage (4)
- Natural language processing (4)
- Power plants (4)
- hydrogen (4)
- solar sail (4)
- Associated liquids (3)
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
Supervised machine learning and deep learning require a large amount of labeled data, which data scientists obtain in a manual, and time-consuming annotation process. To mitigate this challenge, Active Learning (AL) proposes promising data points to annotators they annotate next instead of a subsequent or random sample. This method is supposed to save annotation effort while maintaining model performance.
However, practitioners face many AL strategies for different tasks and need an empirical basis to choose between them. Surveys categorize AL strategies into taxonomies without performance indications. Presentations of novel AL strategies compare the performance to a small subset of strategies. Our contribution addresses the empirical basis by introducing a reproducible active learning evaluation (ALE) framework for the comparative evaluation of AL strategies in NLP.
The framework allows the implementation of AL strategies with low effort and a fair data-driven comparison through defining and tracking experiment parameters (e.g., initial dataset size, number of data points per query step, and the budget). ALE helps practitioners to make more informed decisions, and researchers can focus on developing new, effective AL strategies and deriving best practices for specific use cases. With best practices, practitioners can lower their annotation costs. We present a case study to illustrate how to use the framework.
Energy-efficient components do not automatically lead to energy-efficient systems. Technical Operations Research (TOR) shifts the focus from the single component to the system as a whole and finds its optimal topology and operating strategy simultaneously. In previous works, we provided a preselected construction kit of suitable components for the algorithm. This approach may give rise to a combinatorial explosion if the preselection cannot be cut down to a reasonable number by human intuition. To reduce the number of discrete decisions, we integrate laws derived from similarity theory into the optimization model. Since the physical characteristics of a production series are similar, it can be described by affinity and scaling laws. Making use of these laws, our construction kit can be modeled more efficiently: Instead of a preselection of components, it now encompasses whole model ranges. This allows us to significantly increase the number of possible set-ups in our model. In this paper, we present how to embed this new formulation into a mixed-integer program and assess the run time via benchmarks. We present our approach on the example of a ventilation system design problem.