Article
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (31) (remove)
Language
- English (31) (remove)
Keywords
- Earthquake (4)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Behaviour factor q (1)
- Cardiovascular MRI (1)
- Civil engineering (1)
- Decoupling (1)
- Emilia-Romagna earthquake (1)
- Empirical consequence curves (1)
- Empirical fragility functions (1)
- Frame structure (1)
- Genetic algorithm (1)
- INSYSME (1)
- In-plane performance, isolation (1)
- Infill wall design (1)
- Left ventriular function (1)
- Linear elastic analysis (1)
- MR-stethoscope (1)
- Magnetic field strength (1)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1)
- Masonry infill (1)
- Masonry partition walls (1)
- Modern constructions (1)
- Monte Carlo Tree Search (1)
- Multi-storey (1)
- Numerical modelling (1)
- Out-of-plane capacity (1)
- PBEE (1)
- Piping (1)
- Precast buildings (1)
- Reinforced concrete frame (1)
- Seismic design (1)
- Seismic loading (1)
- Slab deflection (1)
- Structural design (1)
- Tank (1)
- Unreinforced masonry buildings (1)
- body limbs (1)
- cardiac gating (1)
- cardiovascular MR imaging (1)
- churches (1)
- deserts (1)
- earthquake engineering (1)
- electrocardiogram (1)
- equivalent stiffness (1)
- granular silo (1)
- high field MR imaging (1)
- hypoplasticity (1)
- impulsive effects (1)
- liquid-storage tank (1)
- liquid-structure interaction (1)
- lizards (1)
- macro-element (1)
- magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- nonlinear transient analyses (1)
- phonocardiogram (1)
- seismic response (1)
- structure-soil-structure interaction (1)
- swimming (1)
- truss (1)
- vault (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (31) (remove)
The sandfish (Scincus scincus) is a lizard having the remarkable ability to move through desert sand for significant distances. It is well adapted to living in loose sand by virtue of a combination of morphological and behavioural specializations. We investigated the bodyform of the sandfish using 3D-laserscanning and explored its locomotion in loose desert sand using fast nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging. The sandfish exhibits an in-plane meandering motion with a frequency of about 3 Hz and an amplitude of about half its body length accompanied by swimming-like (or trotting) movements of its limbs. No torsion of the body was observed, a movement required for a digging-behaviour. Simple calculations based on the Janssen model for granular material related to our findings on bodyform and locomotor behaviour render a local decompaction of the sand surrounding the moving sandfish very likely. Thus the sand locally behaves as a viscous fluid and not as a solid material. In this fluidised sand the sandfish is able to “swim” using its limbs.
Objective: As high-field cardiac MRI (CMR) becomes more widespread the propensity of ECG to interference from electromagnetic fields (EMF) and to magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) effects increases and with it the motivation for a CMR triggering alternative. This study explores the suitability of acoustic cardiac triggering (ACT) for left ventricular (LV) function assessment in healthy subjects (n=14). Methods: Quantitative analysis of 2D CINE steady-state free precession (SSFP) images was conducted to compare ACT’s performance with vector ECG (VCG). Endocardial border sharpness (EBS) was examined paralleled by quantitative LV function assessment. Results: Unlike VCG, ACT provided signal traces free of interference from EMF or MHD effects. In the case of correct Rwave recognition, VCG-triggered 2D CINE SSFP was immune to cardiac motion effects—even at 3.0 T. However, VCG-triggered 2D SSFP CINE imaging was prone to cardiac motion and EBS degradation if R-wave misregistration occurred. ACT-triggered acquisitions yielded LV parameters (end-diastolic volume (EDV), endsystolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular mass (LVM)) comparable with those derived fromVCG-triggered acquisitions (1.5 T: ESVVCG=(56± 17) ml, EDVVCG=(151±32)ml, LVMVCG=(97±27) g, SVVCG=(94± 19)ml, EFVCG=(63±5)% cf. ESVACT= (56±18) ml, EDVACT=(147±36) ml, LVMACT=(102±29) g, SVACT=(91± 22) ml, EFACT=(62±6)%; 3.0 T: ESVVCG=(55±21) ml, EDVVCG=(151±32) ml, LVMVCG=(101±27) g, SVVCG=(96±15) ml, EFVCG=(65±7)% cf. ESVACT=(54±20) ml, EDVACT=(146±35) ml, LVMACT= (101±30) g, SVACT=(92±17) ml, EFACT=(64±6)%). Conclusions: ACT’s intrinsic insensitivity to interference from electromagnetic fields renders