Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (185) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (61)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (37)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (26)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (21)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (19)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (18)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (14)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (12)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (11)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (10)
Language
- English (185) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (121)
- Conference Proceeding (48)
- Part of a Book (8)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (4)
- Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Patent (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- avalanche (2)
- Cardiovascular MRI (1)
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (1)
- Commercial Vehicle (1)
- Common Rail Injection System (1)
- Dekontamination (1)
- Diesel Engine (1)
- Endothelzelle (1)
- Erythrozyt (1)
- European Transient Cycle (1)
Normative Regulations
(2010)
During the development process of a complex technical product, one widely used and important technique is accelerated testing where the applied stress on a component is chosen to exceed the reference stress, i.e. the stress encountered in field operation, in order to reduce the time to failure. For that, the reference stress has to be known. Since a complex technical product may fail regarding numerous failure modes, stress in general is highly dimensional rather than scalar. In addition, customers use their products individually, i.e. field operation should be described by a distribution rather than by one scalar stress value. In this paper, a way to span the customer usage space is shown. It allows the identification of worst case reference stress profiles in significantly reduced dimensions with minimal loss of information. The application example shows that even for a complex product like a combustion engine, stress information can be compressed significantly. With low measurement effort it turned out that only three reference stress cycles were sufficient to cover a broad range of customer stress variety.
Two- and three-dimensional avalanche dynamics models are being increasingly used in hazard-mitigation studies. These models can provide improved and more accurate results for hazard mapping than the simple one-dimensional models presently used in practice. However, two- and three-dimensional models generate an extensive amount of output data, making the interpretation of simulation results more difficult. To perform a simulation in three-dimensional terrain, numerical models require a digital elevation model, specification of avalanche release areas (spatial extent and volume), selection of solution methods, finding an adequate calculation resolution and, finally, the choice of friction parameters. In this paper, the importance and difficulty of correctly setting up and analysing the results of a numerical avalanche dynamics simulation is discussed. We apply the two-dimensional simulation program RAMMS to the 1968 extreme avalanche event In den Arelen. We show the effect of model input variations on simulation results and the dangers and complexities in their interpretation.