Article
Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (3)
- 2023 (2)
- 2022 (5)
- 2021 (6)
- 2020 (6)
- 2019 (7)
- 2018 (10)
- 2017 (5)
- 2016 (12)
- 2015 (7)
- 2014 (10)
- 2013 (10)
- 2012 (11)
- 2011 (22)
- 2010 (19)
- 2009 (18)
- 2008 (20)
- 2007 (21)
- 2006 (16)
- 2005 (13)
- 2004 (17)
- 2003 (6)
- 2002 (12)
- 2001 (10)
- 2000 (14)
- 1999 (17)
- 1998 (11)
- 1997 (11)
- 1996 (9)
- 1995 (11)
- 1994 (14)
- 1993 (9)
- 1992 (7)
- 1991 (3)
- 1990 (5)
- 1989 (5)
- 1988 (5)
- 1987 (2)
- 1986 (1)
- 1985 (6)
- 1984 (1)
- 1982 (1)
- 1981 (1)
- 1980 (4)
- 1979 (2)
- 1978 (3)
- 1976 (1)
- 1975 (1)
- 1974 (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (413) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (413) (remove)
Language
- English (413) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (413) (remove)
Keywords
- Hot S-parameter (2)
- MINLP (2)
- 197m/gHg (1)
- 3-D printing (1)
- Automated driving (1)
- Automotive application (1)
- Benchmark (1)
- Bloom’s Taxonomy (1)
- Booster Stations (1)
- Buffering Capacity (1)
Planning the layout and operation of a technical system is a common task
for an engineer. Typically, the workflow is divided into consecutive stages: First,
the engineer designs the layout of the system, with the help of his experience or of
heuristic methods. Secondly, he finds a control strategy which is often optimized
by simulation. This usually results in a good operating of an unquestioned sys-
tem topology. In contrast, we apply Operations Research (OR) methods to find a
cost-optimal solution for both stages simultaneously via mixed integer program-
ming (MILP). Technical Operations Research (TOR) allows one to find a provable
global optimal solution within the model formulation. However, the modeling error
due to the abstraction of physical reality remains unknown. We address this ubiq-
uitous problem of OR methods by comparing our computational results with mea-
surements in a test rig. For a practical test case we compute a topology and control
strategy via MILP and verify that the objectives are met up to a deviation of 8.7%.
Resilience as a concept has found its way into different disciplines to describe the ability of an individual or system to withstand and adapt to changes in its environment. In this paper, we provide an overview of the concept in different communities and extend it to the area of mechanical engineering. Furthermore, we present metrics to measure resilience in technical systems and illustrate them by applying them to load-carrying structures. By giving application examples from the Collaborative Research Centre (CRC) 805, we show how the concept of resilience can be used to control uncertainty during different stages of product life.