Article
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (1594)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (705)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (638)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (609)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (602)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (542)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (490)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (451)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (380)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (333)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (107)
- Fachbereich Architektur (83)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (58)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (49)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (42)
- Nowum-Energy (36)
- Sonstiges (23)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (20)
- Freshman Institute (18)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (16)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (10)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (3)
- IMP - Institut für Mikrowellen- und Plasmatechnik (3)
- Verwaltung (3)
- FH Aachen (2)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (2)
- Kommission für Planung und Finanzen (1)
- Senat (1)
Language
Document Type
- Article (5658) (remove)
Keywords
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (7)
- Multimediamarkt (6)
- Rapid prototyping (5)
- avalanche (5)
- Earthquake (4)
- FEM (4)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (4)
- LAPS (4)
- Rapid Prototyping (4)
- biosensors (4)
Es wird die Synthese der Sequenz A 6–9 des Schafinsulins in der geschützten Form Boc-Cys-Cys-Ala-Gly-OBuᵗ (5) sowie das Verhalten dieses monomeren cyclischen Cystinpeptidderivates gegenüber den in der Peptidchemie gebräuchlichen Reagenzien Bortrifluorid/Eisessig, Triäthylamin und Hydrazinhydrat beschrieben.
Synthese der Sequenz 71—86 des Humanproinsulins, III : Synthese über die Fragmente 71—78 und 79—86
(1979)
As a low-input crop, Miscanthus offers numerous advantages that, in addition to agricultural applications, permits its exploitation for energy, fuel, and material production. Depending on the Miscanthus genotype, season, and harvest time as well as plant component (leaf versus stem), correlations between structure and properties of the corresponding isolated lignins differ. Here, a comparative study is presented between lignins isolated from M. x giganteus, M. sinensis, M. robustus and M. nagara using a catalyst-free organosolv pulping process. The lignins from different plant constituents are also compared regarding their similarities and differences regarding monolignol ratio and important linkages. Results showed that the plant genotype has the weakest influence on monolignol content and interunit linkages. In contrast, structural differences are more significant among lignins of different harvest time and/or season. Analyses were performed using fast and simple methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Data was assigned to four different linkages (A: β-O-4 linkage, B: phenylcoumaran, C: resinol, D: β-unsaturated ester). In conclusion, A content is particularly high in leaf-derived lignins at just under 70% and significantly lower in stem and mixture lignins at around 60% and almost 65%. The second most common linkage pattern is D in all isolated lignins, the proportion of which is also strongly dependent on the crop portion. Both stem and mixture lignins, have a relatively high share of approximately 20% or more (maximum is M. sinensis Sin2 with over 30%). In the leaf-derived lignins, the proportions are significantly lower on average. Stem samples should be chosen if the highest possible lignin content is desired, specifically from the M. x giganteus genotype, which revealed lignin contents up to 27%. Due to the better frost resistance and higher stem stability, M. nagara offers some advantages compared to M. x giganteus. Miscanthus crops are shown to be very attractive lignocellulose feedstock (LCF) for second generation biorefineries and lignin generation in Europe.
High aerodynamic efficiency requires propellers with high aspect ratios, while propeller sweep potentially reduces noise. Propeller sweep and high aspect ratios increase elasticity and coupling of structural mechanics and aerodynamics, affecting the propeller performance and noise. Therefore, this paper analyzes the influence of elasticity on forward-swept, backward-swept, and unswept propellers in hover conditions. A reduced-order blade element momentum approach is coupled with a one-dimensional Timoshenko beam theory and Farassat's formulation 1A. The results of the aeroelastic simulation are used as input for the aeroacoustic calculation. The analysis shows that elasticity influences noise radiation because thickness and loading noise respond differently to deformations. In the case of the backward-swept propeller, the location of the maximum sound pressure level shifts forward by 0.5 °, while in the case of the forward-swept propeller, it shifts backward by 0.5 °. Therefore, aeroacoustic optimization requires the consideration of propeller deformation.
This paper compares several blade element theory (BET) method-based propeller simulation tools, including an evaluation against static propeller ground tests and high-fidelity Reynolds-Average Navier Stokes (RANS) simulations. Two proprietary propeller geometries for paraglider applications are analysed in static and flight conditions. The RANS simulations are validated with the static test data and used as a reference for comparing the BET in flight conditions. The comparison includes the analysis of varying 2D aerodynamic airfoil parameters and different induced velocity calculation methods. The evaluation of the BET propeller simulation tools shows the strength of the BET tools compared to RANS simulations. The RANS simulations underpredict static experimental data within 10% relative error, while appropriate BET tools overpredict the RANS results by 15–20% relative error. A variation in 2D aerodynamic data depicts the need for highly accurate 2D data for accurate BET results. The nonlinear BET coupled with XFOIL for the 2D aerodynamic data matches best with RANS in static operation and flight conditions. The novel BET tool PropCODE combines both approaches and offers further correction models for highly accurate static and flight condition results.