Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (193) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (63)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (40)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (38)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (30)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (19)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (19)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (16)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (11)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (8)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (8)
Has Fulltext
- no (193) (remove)
Language
- English (193) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (94)
- Conference Proceeding (74)
- Part of a Book (15)
- Book (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (2)
- Talk (1)
Keywords
- Enterprise Architecture (2)
- Seismic design (2)
- Achilles tendon (1)
- Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS/AD) (1)
- Aircraft design (1)
- Analytics (1)
- Architectural gear ratio (1)
- Assistive technology (1)
- Automatic control (1)
- BEV (1)
Searching optimal continuous-thrust trajectories is usually a difficult and time-consuming task. The solution quality of traditional optimal-control methods depends strongly on an adequate initial guess because the solution is typically close to the initial guess, which may be far from the (unknown) global optimum. Evolutionary neurocontrol attacks continuous-thrust optimization problems from the perspective of artificial intelligence and machine learning, combining artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms. This chapter describes the method and shows some example results for single- and multi-phase continuous-thrust trajectory optimization problems to assess its performance. Evolutionary neurocontrol can explore the trajectory search space more exhaustively than a human expert can do with traditional optimal-control methods. Especially for difficult problems, it usually finds solutions that are closer to the global optimum. Another fundamental advantage is that continuous-thrust trajectories can be optimized without an initial guess and without expert supervision.
Industrial units consist of the primary load-carrying structure and various process engineering components, the latter being by far the most important in financial terms. In addition, supply structures such as free-standing tanks and silos are usually required for each plant to ensure the supply of material and product storage. Thus, for the earthquake-proof design of industrial plants, design and construction rules are required for the primary structures, the secondary structures and the supply structures. Within the framework of these rules, possible interactions of primary and secondary structures must also be taken into account. Importance factors are used in seismic design in order to take into account the usually higher risk potential of an industrial unit compared to conventional building structures. Industrial facilities must be able to withstand seismic actions because of possibly wide-ranging damage consequences in addition to losses due to production standstill and the destruction of valuable equipment. The chapter presents an integrated concept for the seismic design of industrial units based on current seismic standards and the latest research results. Special attention is devoted to the seismic design of steel thin-walled silos and tank structures.