Article
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (700) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (700) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (700) (remove)
Keywords
- Datenschutz (2)
- Datenschutzgrundverordnung (2)
- rebound-effect (2)
- sustainability (2)
- Atomausstieg (1)
- Bank-issued Warrants (1)
- Brands (1)
- Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1)
- Change (1)
- Clinical decision support systems (1)
- Consensus (1)
- Discourse ethics (1)
- Disposition Effect (1)
- Europäische Energiepolitik (1)
- Explainability (1)
- Feature selection (1)
- Finland (1)
- Germany (1)
- Human Development Index (1)
- Individual Investors (1)
- Informationstechnik (1)
- Instructional design (1)
- Justice (1)
- Kernenergie (1)
- Latvia (1)
- Luxury (1)
- Measurement models (1)
- Measurement uncertainty (1)
- Medical AI (1)
- Modelling (1)
- Negative Feedback Trading (1)
- Normative standards (1)
- Operations (1)
- Rechtsgebiet (1)
- Requirements prioritization (1)
- Requirements relations (1)
- SSE) JEL : O33 (1)
- Schadensersatz (1)
- Tool support (1)
- Trading Behavior (1)
- automotive (1)
- business culture (1)
- change (1)
- climate change (1)
- corporate sustainability (1)
- critical (1)
- digital twin (1)
- efficiency side-effects (1)
- entrepreneurship education (1)
- eye movement modelling examples (1)
- grey energy (1)
- industry 4.0 (1)
- jevons paradox (1)
- literature (1)
- management (1)
- marketing (1)
- motivation (1)
- resource abundance (1)
- review (1)
- socio-economic welfare (1)
- systematic (1)
- video learning (1)
Sonderbilanz und Status
(2003)
The construction of a statistical test is investigated which is based only on “reliability” and “precision” as quality criteria. The reliability of a statistical test is quantifiedin a straightforward way by the probability that the decision of the test is correct. However, the quantification of the precision of a statistical test is not at all evident. Thereforethe paper presents and discusses several approaches. Moreover the distinction of “nullhypothesis” and “alternative hypothesis” is not necessary any longer.
By developing innovative solutions to social and environmental problems, sustainable ventures carry greatpotential. Entrepreneurship which focuses especially on new venture creation can be developed through education anduniversities, in particular, are called upon to provide an impetus for social change. But social innovations are associatedwith certain hurdles, which are related to the multi-dimensionality, i.e. the tension between creating social,environmental and economic value and dealing with a multiplicity of stakeholders. The already complex field ofentrepreneurship education has to face these challenges. This paper, therefore, aims to identify starting points for theintegration of sustainability into entrepreneurship education. To pursue this goal experiences from three differentproject initiatives between the partner universities: Lapland University of Applied Sciences, FH Aachen University ofApplied Sciences and Turiba University are reflected and findings are systematically condensed into recommendationsfor education on sustainable entrepreneurship.