Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (1565)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (711)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (564)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (561)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (537)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (533)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (481)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (262)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (205)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (161)
Has Fulltext
- no (4686) (remove)
Language
- English (4686) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3194)
- Conference Proceeding (1033)
- Part of a Book (191)
- Book (144)
- Doctoral Thesis (30)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (28)
- Patent (25)
- Other (10)
- Report (9)
- Conference Poster (5)
Keywords
- Gamification (6)
- avalanche (6)
- Earthquake (5)
- Enterprise Architecture (5)
- MINLP (5)
- solar sail (5)
- Additive manufacturing (4)
- Diversity Management (4)
- Energy storage (4)
- Engineering optimization (4)
The transition within transportation towards battery electric vehicles can lead to a more sustainable future. To account for the development goal ‘climate action’ stated by the United Nations, it is mandatory, within the conceptual design phase, to derive energy-efficient system designs. One barrier is the uncertainty of the driving behaviour within the usage phase. This uncertainty is often addressed by using a stochastic synthesis process to derive representative driving cycles and by using cycle-based optimization. To deal with this uncertainty, a new approach based on a stochastic optimization program is presented. This leads to an optimization model that is solved with an exact solver. It is compared to a system design approach based on driving cycles and a genetic algorithm solver. Both approaches are applied to find efficient electric powertrains with fixed-speed and multi-speed transmissions. Hence, the similarities, differences and respective advantages of each optimization procedure are discussed.