Conference Proceeding
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (286)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (226)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (198)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (188)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (164)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (150)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (114)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (103)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (59)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (54)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (44)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (41)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (34)
- Nowum-Energy (22)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (17)
- Fachbereich Architektur (13)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (8)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (3)
- IaAM - Institut für angewandte Automation und Mechatronik (3)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (2)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (2)
- Verwaltung (2)
- Digitalisierung in Studium & Lehre (1)
- FH Aachen (1)
- Freshman Institute (1)
- Kommission für Planung und Finanzen (1)
- Senat (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (1413) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (1413) (remove)
Keywords
- Enterprise Architecture (5)
- Gamification (5)
- Energy storage (4)
- Natural language processing (4)
- Power plants (4)
- hydrogen (4)
- solar sail (4)
- Associated liquids (3)
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
Andere Primärenergiequellen
(1974)
Analysis of error and time behavior of the IEEE 802.15.4 PHY-layer in an industrial environment
(2006)
With the many achievements of Machine Learning in the past years, it is likely that the sub-area of Deep Learning will continue to deliver major technological breakthroughs [1]. In order to achieve best results, it is important to know the various different Deep Learning frameworks and their respective properties. This paper provides a comparative overview of some of the most popular frameworks. First, the comparison methods and criteria are introduced and described with a focus on computer vision applications: Features and Uses are examined by evaluating papers and articles, Adoption and Popularity is determined by analyzing a data science study. Then, the frameworks TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch and Caffe are compared based on the previously described criteria to highlight properties and differences. Advantages and disadvantages are compared, enabling researchers and developers to choose a framework according to their specific needs.