Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (259) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (67)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (37)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (34)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (33)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (32)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (27)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (27)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (23)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (14)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (12)
Document Type
- Article (108)
- Conference Proceeding (86)
- Part of a Book (33)
- Book (14)
- Other (11)
- Part of a Periodical (2)
- Report (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Patent (1)
Keywords
- Autonomous mobile robots (2)
- Gamification (2)
- Industry 4.0 (2)
- MASCOT (2)
- Multi-robot systems (2)
- Smart factory (2)
- 3D nonlinear finite element model (1)
- Acceptance tests (1)
- Ausfachungsmauerwerk (1)
- Automated Optimization (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (259)
The methodological discourse of mixed-methods research offers general procedures to combine quantitative and qualitative methods for investigating complex fields of research such as higher education. However, integrating different methods still poses considerable challenges. To move beyond general recommendations for mixed-methods research, this chapter proposes to discuss methodological issues with respect to a particular research domain. Taking current studies on the transition to higher education as an example, the authors first provide an overview of the potentials and limitations of quantitative and qualitative methods in the research domain. Second, they show the need for a conceptual framework grounded in the theory of the research object to guide the integration of different methods and findings. Finally, an example study that investigates transition with regard to the interplay of the individual student and the institutional context serves to illustrate the guiding role of theory. The framework integrates different theoretical perspectives on transition, informs the selection of the research methods, and defines the nexus of the two strands that constitute the mixed-methods design. As the interplay of individual and context is of concern for teaching and learning in general, the example presented may be fruitful for the wider field of higher education research.
This chapter introduces performance and acceptance testing and describes state-of-the-art tools, methods, and instruments to assess the plant performance or realize plant acceptance testing. The status of the development of standards for performance assessment is given.