Part of a Book
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (43)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (38)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (34)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (26)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (24)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (18)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (14)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (10)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (8)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (8)
Has Fulltext
- no (190)
Language
- English (190) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (190) (remove)
Keywords
- Papierkunst (4)
- Wind Tunnel (3)
- Aktionskunst (2)
- Central receiver power plant (2)
- Central receiver system (2)
- Concentrated solar collector (2)
- Concentrated systems (2)
- Engineering optimization (2)
- Flight Test (2)
- Gas turbine (2)
Pure analytical or experimental methods can only find a control strategy for technical systems with a fixed setup. In former contributions we presented an approach that simultaneously finds the optimal topology and the optimal open-loop control of a system via Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP). In order to extend this approach by a closed-loop control we present a Mixed Integer Program for a time discretized tank level control. This model is the basis for an extension by combinatorial decisions and thus for the variation of the network topology. Furthermore, one is able to appraise feasible solutions using the global optimality gap.
Genetically humanized mice for proteins involved in drug metabolism and toxicity and mice engrafted with human hepatocytes are emerging as promising in vivo models for improved prediction of the pharmacokinetic, drug–drug interaction, and safety characteristics of compounds in humans. This is an overview on the genetically humanized and chimeric liver-humanized mouse models, which are illustrated with examples of their utility in drug metabolism and toxicity studies. The models are compared to give guidance for selection of the most appropriate model by highlighting advantages and disadvantages to be carefully considered when used for studies in drug discovery and development.
The methodological discourse of mixed-methods research offers general procedures to combine quantitative and qualitative methods for investigating complex fields of research such as higher education. However, integrating different methods still poses considerable challenges. To move beyond general recommendations for mixed-methods research, this chapter proposes to discuss methodological issues with respect to a particular research domain. Taking current studies on the transition to higher education as an example, the authors first provide an overview of the potentials and limitations of quantitative and qualitative methods in the research domain. Second, they show the need for a conceptual framework grounded in the theory of the research object to guide the integration of different methods and findings. Finally, an example study that investigates transition with regard to the interplay of the individual student and the institutional context serves to illustrate the guiding role of theory. The framework integrates different theoretical perspectives on transition, informs the selection of the research methods, and defines the nexus of the two strands that constitute the mixed-methods design. As the interplay of individual and context is of concern for teaching and learning in general, the example presented may be fruitful for the wider field of higher education research.
This chapter introduces performance and acceptance testing and describes state-of-the-art tools, methods, and instruments to assess the plant performance or realize plant acceptance testing. The status of the development of standards for performance assessment is given.
Names of individuals
(2017)