Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (2077)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (1184)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1164)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (1115)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (912)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (876)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (798)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (711)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (690)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (615)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (513)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (340)
- Fachbereich Architektur (198)
- FH Aachen (154)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (130)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (74)
- Nowum-Energy (72)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (71)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (32)
- Sonstiges (24)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (22)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (20)
- Freshman Institute (19)
- Verwaltung (11)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (5)
- IaAM - Institut für angewandte Automation und Mechatronik (4)
- IMP - Institut für Mikrowellen- und Plasmatechnik (3)
- Kommission für Planung und Finanzen (2)
- Senat (2)
- Datenverarbeitungszentrale (1)
- Digitalisierung in Studium & Lehre (1)
Language
- German (5130)
- English (4929)
- Russian (14)
- Portuguese (6)
- Italian (5)
- Multiple languages (5)
- Spanish (3)
- Dutch (2)
Document Type
- Article (5658)
- Conference Proceeding (1650)
- Book (1083)
- Part of a Book (570)
- Bachelor Thesis (327)
- Patent (174)
- Report (102)
- Doctoral Thesis (80)
- Other (76)
- Administrative publication (76)
Keywords
- Amtliche Mitteilung (71)
- Bachelor (33)
- Aachen University of Applied Sciences (31)
- Master (31)
- Prüfungsordnung (31)
- Bauingenieurwesen (30)
- Lesbare Fassung (28)
- Biosensor (25)
- Fachhochschule Aachen (23)
- Illustration (23)
Zugriffsart
- campus (2151)
- weltweit (1882)
- bezahl (773)
- fachbereichsweit (FB4) (34)
Eine neue Generation von Praktika an Hochschulen wächst heran. Moderne Wege beim Verstehen und Erlernen naturwissenschaftlicher Zusammenhänge sowie industrieller Fertigungsprozesse sind gefordert. Das Technologiepraktikum „Virtuelle Sensor- Fertigung“, entwickelt im Verbundprojekt INGMEDIA an den Fachhochschulen Aachen und Zweibrücken, trägt als neuartiges Lern- und Lehrmodul dieser Forderung Rechnung. Die Studierenden lernen einen vollständigen Fertigungsprozess mit Hilfe von virtuellen, in LabVIEW programmierten Maschinen kennen, bevor sie die reale Prozesskette im Reinraum durchführen.
Close interrelations between sound and image are not a mere phenomenon of today’s multimedia technology. The idea of the synthesis of different media lies at the core of the concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk in the second half of the 19th century and it can also be traced back to the synaesthesia debate at the beginning of the 20th century [...].
Kunstwerke sowie ihre Präsentation und Vermittlung werden zunehmend von digitalen Technologien unterstützt. Virtuelle Ausstellungen, Internet-Projekte und komplexe Datenarchive stellen das Kunstwerk in einen medialen Kontext, der weit über das Moment einer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit hinausgeht. Das allgegenwärtige Konzept der Vernetzung dynamisiert Kunst, ihre Rezipienten und Ausstellungsorte. Die Beziehungen zwischen diesen Feldern werden mit Hilfe physiologischer Metaphern definiert und visualisiert. Frühere Speicher und Archive geraten in einen prozessualen Sog, in dem alles fluktuiert, sich kurzweilig verknüpft, auflöst und in permanente Dialoge mit seiner Umgebung tritt - das virtuelle Museum gerät in aktuellen Standortbestimmungen in die definitorische Nähe des Künstlichen Lebens.
The load-carrying capacity or the safety against plastic limit states are the central questions in the design of structures and passive components in the apparatus engineering. A precise answer is most simply given by limit and shakedown analysis. These methods can be based on static and kinematic theorems for lower and upper bound analysis. Both may be formulated as optimization problems for finite element discretizations of structures. The problems of large-scale analysis and the extension towards realistic material modelling will be solved in a European research project. Limit and shakedown analyses are briefly demonstrated with illustrative examples.
This paper presents the direct route to Design by Analysis (DBA) of the new European pressure vessel standard in the language of limit and shakedown analysis (LISA). This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for some examples from the DBA-Manual. One observation from the examples is, that the optimisation approach gives reliable and close lower bound solutions leading to simple and optimised design decision.
Limit and shakedown analysis are effective methods for assessing the load carrying capacity of a given structure. The elasto–plastic behavior of the structure subjected to loads varying in a given load domain is characterized by the shakedown load factor, defined as the maximum factor which satisfies the sufficient conditions stated in the corresponding static shakedown theorem. The finite element dicretization of the problem may lead to very large convex optimization. For the effective solution a basis reduction method has been developed that makes use of the special problem structure for perfectly plastic material. The paper proposes a modified basis reduction method for direct application to the two-surface plasticity model of bounded kinematic hardening material. The considered numerical examples show an enlargement of the load carrying capacity due to bounded hardening.
Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratchetting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratchetting range. The performed experiment comprised a hollow tension specimen which was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with constant moments. First, a series of uniaxial tests has been carried out in order to calibrate a bounded kinematic hardening rule. The load parameters have been selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses with the PERMAS code using a kinematic hardening material model. It is shown that this shakedown analysis gives reasonable agreement between the experimental and the numerical results. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis.
In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion.
Limit loads can be calculated with the finite element method (FEM) for any component, defect geometry, and loading. FEM suggests that published long crack limit formulae for axial defects under-estimate the burst pressure for internal surface defects in thick pipes while limit loads are not conservative for deep cracks and for pressure loaded crack-faces. Very deep cracks have a residual strength, which is modelled by a global collapse load. These observations are combined to derive new analytical local and global collapse loads. The global collapse loads are close to FEM limit analyses for all crack dimensions.
Fatigue analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying that thermal ratcheting is limited. To this end it is important to make a clear distintion between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range (continuing deformation). As part of an EU-supported research project, experiments were carried out using a 4-bar model. The experiment comprised a water-cooled internal tube, and three insulated heatable outer test bars. The system was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with alternating temperatures at the outer bars. The test parameters were partly selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses. During the test, temperatures and strains were measured as a function of time. The loads and the resulting stresses were confirmed on an ongoing basis during performance of the test, and after it. Different material models were applied for this incremental elasto-plastic analysis using the ANSYS program. The results of the simulation are used to verify the FEM-based shakedown analysis.