Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (2087)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (1190)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1167)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (1117)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (920)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (885)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (801)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (712)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (693)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (616)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (523)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (340)
- Fachbereich Architektur (199)
- FH Aachen (155)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (133)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (74)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (74)
- Nowum-Energy (72)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (36)
- Sonstiges (24)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (22)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (20)
- Freshman Institute (19)
- Verwaltung (11)
- IaAM - Institut für angewandte Automation und Mechatronik (6)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (5)
- IMP - Institut für Mikrowellen- und Plasmatechnik (4)
- Kommission für Planung und Finanzen (3)
- Senat (2)
- Datenverarbeitungszentrale (1)
- Digitalisierung in Studium & Lehre (1)
Language
- German (5150)
- English (4961)
- Russian (14)
- Portuguese (6)
- Italian (5)
- Multiple languages (5)
- Spanish (3)
- Dutch (2)
Document Type
- Article (5641)
- Conference Proceeding (1683)
- Book (1087)
- Part of a Book (578)
- Bachelor Thesis (332)
- Patent (177)
- Report (102)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (83)
- Doctoral Thesis (82)
- Administrative publication (77)
Keywords
- Amtliche Mitteilung (72)
- Bachelor (34)
- Aachen University of Applied Sciences (31)
- Master (31)
- Prüfungsordnung (31)
- Bauingenieurwesen (30)
- Lesbare Fassung (28)
- Biosensor (25)
- Fachhochschule Aachen (23)
- Illustration (23)
Zugriffsart
- campus (2155)
- weltweit (1913)
- bezahl (790)
- fachbereichsweit (FB4) (38)
In this review article, we are going to present an overview on possible applications of light-addressable electrodes (LAE) as actuator/manipulation devices besides classical electrode structures. For LAEs, the electrode material consists of a semiconductor. Illumination with a light source with the appropiate wavelength leads to the generation of electron-hole pairs which can be utilized for further photoelectrochemical reaction. Due to recent progress in light-projection technologies, highly dynamic and flexible illumination patterns can be generated, opening new possibilities for light-addressable electrodes. A short introduction on semiconductor–electrolyte interfaces with light stimulation is given together with electrode-design approaches. Towards applications, the stimulation of cells with different electrode materials and fabrication designs is explained, followed by analyte-manipulation strategies and spatially resolved photoelectrochemical deposition of different material types.
In this paper we report on an architecture for a self-driving car that is based on ROS2. Self-driving cars have to take decisions based on their sensory input in real-time, providing high reliability with a strong demand in functional safety. In principle, self-driving cars are robots. However, typical robot software, in general, and the previous version of the Robot Operating System (ROS), in particular, does not always meet these requirements. With the successor ROS2 the situation has changed and it might be considered as a solution for automated and autonomous driving. Existing robotic software based on ROS was not ready for safety critical applications like self-driving cars. We propose an architecture for using ROS2 for a self-driving car that enables safe and reliable real-time behaviour, but keeping the advantages of ROS such as a distributed architecture and standardised message types. First experiments with an automated real passenger car at lower and higher speed-levels show that our approach seems feasible for autonomous driving under the necessary real-time conditions.
α-hydroxy ketones (HK) and 1,2-diols are important building blocks for fine chemical synthesis. Here, we describe the R-selective 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase from B. clausii DSM 8716ᵀ (BcBDH) that belongs to the metal-dependent medium chain dehydrogenases/reductases family (MDR) and catalyzes the selective asymmetric reduction of prochiral 1,2-diketones to the corresponding HK and, in some cases, the reduction of the same to the corresponding 1,2-diols. Aliphatic diketones, like 2,3-pentanedione, 2,3-hexanedione, 5-methyl-2,3-hexanedione, 3,4-hexanedione and 2,3-heptanedione are well transformed. In addition, surprisingly alkyl phenyl dicarbonyls, like 2-hydroxy-1-phenylpropan-1-one and phenylglyoxal are accepted, whereas their derivatives with two phenyl groups are not substrates. Supplementation of Mn²⁺ (1 mM) increases BcBDH's activity in biotransformations. Furthermore, the biocatalytic reduction of 5-methyl-2,3-hexanedione to mainly 5-methyl-3-hydroxy-2-hexanone with only small amounts of 5-methyl-2-hydroxy-3-hexanone within an enzyme membrane reactor is demonstrated.
With the many achievements of Machine Learning in the past years, it is likely that the sub-area of Deep Learning will continue to deliver major technological breakthroughs [1]. In order to achieve best results, it is important to know the various different Deep Learning frameworks and their respective properties. This paper provides a comparative overview of some of the most popular frameworks. First, the comparison methods and criteria are introduced and described with a focus on computer vision applications: Features and Uses are examined by evaluating papers and articles, Adoption and Popularity is determined by analyzing a data science study. Then, the frameworks TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch and Caffe are compared based on the previously described criteria to highlight properties and differences. Advantages and disadvantages are compared, enabling researchers and developers to choose a framework according to their specific needs.
Neue Perspektiven für die Bahn in der Produktions- und Distributionslogistik durch Prozessautomation
(2020)
With the variety of toothbrushes on the market, the question arises, which toothbrush is best suited to maintain oral health? This thematic review focuses first on plaque formation mechanisms and then on the plaque removal effectiveness of ultrasonic toothbrushes and their potential in preventing oral diseases like periodontitis, gingivitis, and caries. We overviewed the physical effects that occurred during brushing and tried to address the question of whether ultrasonic toothbrushes effectively reduced the microbial burden by increasing the hydrodynamic forces. The results of published studies show that electric toothbrushes, which combine ultrasonic and sonic (or acoustic and mechanic) actions, may have the most promising effect on good oral health. Existing ultrasonic/sonic toothbrush models do not significantly differ regarding the removal of dental biofilm and the reduction of gingival inflammation compared with other electrically powered toothbrushes, whereas the manual toothbrushes show a lower effectiveness.
Background
For supratentorial craniotomy, surgical access, and closure technique, including placement of subgaleal drains, may vary considerably. The influence of surgical nuances on postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage or impaired wound healing overall remains largely unclear. With this study, we are reporting our experiences and the impact of our clinical routines on outcome in a prospectively collected data set.
Method
We prospectively observed 150 consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy and recorded technical variables (type/length of incision, size of craniotomy, technique of dural and skin closure, type of dressing, and placement of subgaleal drains). Outcome variables (subgaleal hematoma/CSF collection, periorbital edema, impairment of wound healing, infection, and need for operative revision) were recorded at time of discharge and at late follow-up.
Results
Early subgaleal fluid collection was observed in 36.7% (2.8% at the late follow-up), and impaired wound healing was recorded in 3.3% of all cases, with an overall need for operative revision of 6.7%. Neither usage of dural sealants, lack of watertight dural closure, and presence of subgaleal drains, nor type of skin closure or dressing influenced outcome. Curved incisions, larger craniotomy, and tumor size, however, were associated with an increase in early CSF or hematoma collection (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001, p < 0.01 resp.), and larger craniotomy size was associated with longer persistence of subgaleal fluid collections (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Based on our setting, individual surgical nuances such as the type of dural closure and the use of subgaleal drains resulted in a comparable complication rate and outcome. Subgaleal fluid collections were frequently observed after supratentorial procedures, irrespective of the closing technique employed, and resolve spontaneously in the majority of cases without significant sequelae. Our results are limited due to the observational nature in our single-center study and need to be validated by supportive prospective randomized design.