Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (262) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (68)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (44)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (41)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (25)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (24)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (24)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (22)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (22)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (21)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (16)
Document Type
- Article (127)
- Conference Proceeding (78)
- Part of a Book (31)
- Book (12)
- Working Paper (3)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Patent (2)
- Part of a Periodical (2)
- Conference Poster (1)
- Other (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- Datenschutz (2)
- Digitale Transformation (2)
- Energy efficiency (2)
- Engineering optimization (2)
- Literaturanalyse (2)
- MINLP (2)
- Pump System (2)
- Serious Game (2)
- Water (2)
- Actors (1)
Die Geschichte des Designs ist gesäumt von Auseinandersetzungen. Debattiert wird unter Berufsgenossen, in Interessensverbänden, zwischen Wettbewerbern und nicht zuletzt an Hochschulen; als Foren dienen zum Beispiel Zeitungen, Konferenzen oder Gerichtssäle. Doch welche Gründe gibt es für Streit über Design? Die Kontroversen beschränken sich keineswegs auf die Ästhetik von Artefakten. Auch haben wir es trotz der Vielfalt an Streitfällen nicht mit einem unüberschaubaren Feld von zusammenhanglosen Einzelereignissen zu tun. Wie das vorliegende Buch anhand historischer Kontroversen zeigt, lassen sich im Bereich der Gestaltung Streitkategorien identifizieren. Die Diskursanalyse verrät, dass sich die Konfliktursachen im Verlauf der Designhistorie kaum verändern. So haben die angeführten Dispute erstaunliche Ähnlichkeit mit aktuellen Debatten im Fach. Sie sind Lehrstücke und können dazu anregen, eine Streitkultur im Design zu etablieren, die sich davon distanziert, den Meinungsgegner in ein politisches Lager zu ›verräumen‹.
Physical interaction with small solar system bodies (SSSB) is key for in-situ resource utilization (ISRU). The design of mining missions requires good understanding of SSSB properties, including composition, surface and interior structure, and thermal environment. But as the saying goes "If you've seen one asteroid, you've seen one Asteroid": Although some patterns may begin to appear, a stable and reliable scheme of SSSB classification still has to be evolved. Identified commonalities would enable generic ISRU technology and spacecraft design approaches with a high degree of re-use. Strategic approaches require much broader in-depth characterization of the SSSB populations of interest to the ISRU community. The DLR-ESTEC GOSSAMER Roadmap Science Working Groups identified target-flexible Multiple Near-Earth asteroid (NEA) Rendezvous (MNR) as one of the missions only feasible with solar sail propulsion, showed the ability to access any inclination and a wide range of heliocentric distances as well as continuous operation close to Earth's orbit where low delta-v objects reside.
The search for life on Mars and in the Solar System - strategies, logistics and infrastructures
(2018)
The question "Are we alone in the Universe?" is perhaps the most fundamental one that affects mankind. How can we address the search for life in our Solar System? Mars, Enceladus and Europa are the focus of the search for life outside the terrestrial biosphere. While it is more likely to find remnants of life (fossils of extinct life) on Mars because of its past short time window of the surface habitability, it is probably more likely to find traces of extant life on the icy moons and ocean worlds of Jupiter and Saturn. Nevertheless, even on Mars there could still be a chance to find extant life in niches near to the surface or in just discovered subglacial lakes beneath the South Pole ice cap. Here, the different approaches for the detection of traces of life in the form of biosignatures including pre-biotic molecules will be presented. We will outline the required infrastructure for this enterprise and give examples of future mission concepts to investigate the presence of life on other planets and moons. Finally, we will provide suggestions on methods, techniques, operations and strategies for preparation and realization of future life detection missions.
Physical interaction with small solar system bodies (SSSB) is the next step in planetary science, planetary in-situ resource utilization (ISRU), and planetary defense (PD). It requires a broader understanding of the surface properties of the target objects, with particular interest focused on those near Earth. Knowledge of composition, multi-scale surface structure, thermal response, and interior structure is required to design, validate and operate missions addressing these three fields. The current level of understanding is occasionally simplified into the phrase, ”If you’ve seen one asteroid, you’ve seen one asteroid”, meaning that the in-situ characterization of SSSBs has yet to cross the threshold towards a robust and stable scheme of classification. This would enable generic features in spacecraft design, particularly for ISRU and science missions. Currently, it is necessary to characterize any potential target object sufficiently by a dedicated pre-cursor mission to design the mission which then interacts with the object in a complex fashion. To open up strategic approaches, much broader in-depth characterization of potential target objects would be highly desirable. In SSSB science missions, MASCOT-like nano-landers and instrument carriers which integrate at the instrument level to their mothership have met interest. By its size, MASCOT is compatible with small interplanetary missions. The DLR-ESTEC Gossamer Roadmap Science Working Groups‘ studies identified Multiple Near-Earth asteroid (NEA) Rendezvous (MNR) as one of the space science missions only feasible with solar sail propulsion. The Solar Polar Orbiter (SPO) study showed the ability to access any inclination, theDisplaced-L1 (DL1) mission operates close to Earth, where objects of interest to PD and for ISRU reside. Other studies outline the unique capability of solar sails to provide access to all SSSB, at least within the orbit of Jupiter, and significant progress has been made to explore the performance envelope of near-term solar sails for MNR. However, it is difficult for
sailcraft to interact physically with a SSSB. We expand and extend the philosophy of the recently qualified DLR Gossamer solar sail deployment technology using efficient multiple sub-spacecraft integration to also include landers for one-way in-situ investigations and sample-return missions by synergetic integration and operation of sail and lander. The MASCOT design concept and its characteristic features have created an ideal counterpart for thisand has already been adapted to the needs of the AIM spacecraft, former part of the NASA-ESA AIDA missionDesigning the 69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Bremen, Germany, 1-5 October 2018. IAC-18-F1.2.3 Page 2 of 17 combined spacecraft for piggy-back launch accommodation enables low-cost massively parallel access to the NEA population.
This paper introduces a Competence Developing Game (CDG) for the purpose of a cybersecurity awareness training for businesses. The target audience will be discussed in detail to understand their requirements. It will be explained why and how a mix of business simulation and serious game meets these stakeholder requirements. It will be shown that a tablet and touchscreen based approach is the most suitable solution. In addition, an empirical study will be briefly presented. The study was carried out to examine how an interaction system for a 3D-tablet based CDG has to be designed, to be manageable for non-game experienced employees. Furthermore, it will be explained which serious content is necessary for a Cybersecurity awareness training CDG and how this content is wrapped in the game
During the development of a Competence Developing Game’s (CDG) story it is indispensable to understand the target audience. Thereby, CDGs stories represent more than just the plot. The Story is about the
Setting, the Characters and the Plot. As a toolkit to support the
development of such a story, this paper introduces the UserFocused Storybuilding (short UFoS) Framework for CDGs. The Framework and its utilization will be explained, followed by a description of its development and derivation, including an empirical study. In addition, to simplify the Framework use regarding the CDG’s target audience, a new concept of Nine Psychographic Player Types will be explained. This concept of Player Types provides an approach to handle the differences in between players during the UFoS Framework use. Thereby,
this article presents a unique approach to the development of
target group-differentiated CDGs stories.
Nach einem intensiven politischen Diskurs wurde im vergangenen Jahr die Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO) verabschiedet. Die DSGVO ersetzt zum 25.5.2018 die bislang geltende, aus dem Jahre 1995 stammende Datenschutz-Richtlinie 95/46/EG. Die Novellierung des Datenschutzrechts bringt zahlreiche neue Anforderungen mit sich. Unternehmen sind daher gezwungen, sich auf die Änderungen einzustellen, ihre datenschutzrelevanten Prozesse im Hinblick auf die neuen Anforderungen zu überprüfen und bis zum Mai 2018 an der DSGVO auszurichten. Der Beitrag gibt einen kurzen Überblick über die zentralen Aspekte der Datenschutzreform und die damit einhergehenden Herausforderungen für Unternehmen.