Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (129)
- Article (81)
- Part of a Book (27)
- Book (10)
- Report (3)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Talk (1)
Language
- English (138)
- German (114)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- Earthquake (5)
- Seismic design (4)
- INODIS (3)
- Out-of-plane load (3)
- Seismic loading (3)
- earthquakes (3)
- Adjacent buildings (2)
- Historical centres (2)
- INSYSME (2)
- Masonry infill (2)
- Shake table test (2)
- Stone masonry (2)
- Tanks (2)
- industrial facilities (2)
- installations (2)
- piping (2)
- seismic design (2)
- seismic loading (2)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Ausfachungsmauerwerk (1)
- BIM (1)
- Basisisolierung (1)
- Bauwerksüberwachung (1)
- Behaviour factor q (1)
- Bemessung (1)
- Blind prediction competition (1)
- Capacity Curve (1)
- Cardiovascular MRI (1)
- Civil engineering (1)
- Components (1)
- DIN EN 1996 (1)
- Decoupling (1)
- Design examples (1)
- EN 1998-4 (1)
- ESHM20, industrial facilities (1)
- Earthquake Engineering (1)
- Emilia-Romagna earthquake (1)
- Empirical consequence curves (1)
- Empirical fragility functions (1)
- Erdbeben (1)
- Erdbebeneinwirkung (1)
- Eurocode 8 (1)
- Frame structure (1)
- Genetic algorithm (1)
- Gust wind response (1)
- In- plane damage (1)
- In-plane (1)
- In-plane load (1)
- In-plane performance, isolation (1)
- Industrial facilities (1)
- Industrial units (1)
- Infill wall design (1)
- Interaction (1)
- Isolation (1)
- Left ventriular function (1)
- Linear elastic analysis (1)
- MR-stethoscope (1)
- Magnetic field strength (1)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1)
- Masonry partition walls (1)
- Masonry structures (1)
- Mauerwerksbauten (1)
- Mauerwerksgebäude (1)
- Modern constructions (1)
- Momentenverteilung (1)
- Monitoring (1)
- Monte Carlo Tree Search (1)
- Multi-storey (1)
- Neo-Deterministic (1)
- Numerical modelling (1)
- Out-of-plane (1)
- Out-of-plane capacity (1)
- Out-of-plane failure (1)
- Out-of-plane strength (1)
- PBEE (1)
- Piping (1)
- Precast buildings (1)
- Pushover analysis (1)
- PushoverAnalysen (1)
- RC frames (1)
- Rahmentragwirkung (1)
- Reinforced concrete frame (1)
- Response spectrum (1)
- Seismic (1)
- Seismic Hazard (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Silos (1)
- Slab deflection (1)
- Spectral analysis (1)
- Stahlbetonrahmen (1)
- Structural design (1)
- Structural health monitoring (1)
- Tank (1)
- Unreinforced masonry buildings (1)
- Unreinforced masonry walls (1)
- Verhaltensbeiwerte (1)
- Vulnerability Curves (1)
- Wand-Decken-Interaktion (1)
- Wind turbulence (1)
- Window opening (1)
- Ziegelmauerwerk (1)
- behaviour factor q (1)
- body limbs (1)
- cardiac gating (1)
- cardiovascular MR imaging (1)
- churches (1)
- connection detail (1)
- deserts (1)
- early warning and response system (1)
- earthquake (1)
- earthquake engineering (1)
- elastomeric bearing (1)
- electrocardiogram (1)
- equivalent stiffness (1)
- finite element method (1)
- fluid structure interaction (1)
- fragility curves (1)
- friction pendulum bearing (1)
- granular silo (1)
- high field MR imaging (1)
- hypoplasticity (1)
- impulsive effects (1)
- in-plane (1)
- in-plane and out-of-plane failure (1)
- in-plane behaviour (1)
- integration SHM in BIM (1)
- interconnected sensor systems (1)
- linear elastic analysis; (1)
- liquid storage tank (1)
- liquid-storage tank (1)
- liquid-structure interaction (1)
- lizards (1)
- macro-element (1)
- magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- masonry infill (1)
- masonry structures (1)
- modern constructions (1)
- nonlinear transient analyses (1)
- out-of-plane (1)
- out-of-plane behaviour (1)
- phonocardiogram (1)
- safety control (1)
- seismic (1)
- seismic hazard (1)
- seismic isolation (1)
- seismic response (1)
- seismic risk (1)
- seismic structural damage detection via SHM (1)
- seismic vulnerability (1)
- simplified approach (1)
- structure-soil-structure interaction (1)
- swimming (1)
- truss (1)
- unreinforced masonry buildings (1)
- vault (1)
- vocal fold oscillation (1)
Institute
Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Anwendbarkeit statisch nichtlinearer Verfahren nach DIN EN 1998-1
(2011)
A refined substructure technique in the frequency domain is developed, which permits consideration of the interaction effects among adjacent containers through the supporting deformable soil medium. The tank-liquid systems are represented by means of mechanical models, whereas discrete springs and dashpots stand for the soil beneath the foundations. The proposed model is employed to assess the responses of adjacent circular, cylindrical tanks for harmonic and seismic excitations over wide range of tank proportions and soil conditions. The influence of the number, spatial arrangement of the containers and their distance on the overall system's behavior is addressed. The results indicate that the cross-interaction effects can substantially alter the impulsive components of response of each individual element in a tank farm. The degree of this impact is primarily controlled by the tank proportions and the proximity of the predominant natural frequencies of the shell-liquid-soil systems and the input seismic motion. The group effects should be not a priori disregarded, unless the tanks are founded on shallow soil deposit overlying very stiff material or bedrock.
Recent earthquakes as the 2012 Emilia earthquake sequence showed that recently built unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings behaved much better than expected and sustained, despite the maximum PGA values ranged between 0.20–0.30 g, either minor damage or structural damage that is deemed repairable. Especially low-rise residential and commercial masonry buildings with a code-conforming seismic design and detailing behaved in general very well without substantial damages. The low damage grades of modern masonry buildings that was observed during this earthquake series highlighted again that codified design procedures based on linear analysis can be rather conservative. Although advances in simulation tools make nonlinear calculation methods more readily accessible to designers, linear analyses will still be the standard design method for years to come. The present paper aims to improve the linear seismic design method by providing a proper definition of the q-factor of URM buildings. These q-factors are derived for low-rise URM buildings with rigid diaphragms which represent recent construction practise in low to moderate seismic areas of Italy and Germany. The behaviour factor components for deformation and energy dissipation capacity and for overstrength due to the redistribution of forces are derived by means of pushover analyses. Furthermore, considerations on the behaviour factor component due to other sources of overstrength in masonry buildings are presented. As a result of the investigations, rationally based values of the behaviour factor q to be used in linear analyses in the range of 2.0–3.0 are proposed.
Recent earthquakes showed that low-rise URM buildings following codecompliant seismic design and details behaved in general very well without substantial damages. Although advances in simulation tools make nonlinear calculation methods more readily accessible to designers, linear analyses will still be the standard design method for years to come. The present paper aims to improve the linear seismic design method by providing a proper definition of the q-factor of URM buildings. Values of q-factors are derived for low-rise URM buildings with rigid diaphragms, with reference to modern structural configurations realized in low to moderate seismic areas of Italy and Germany. The behaviour factor components for deformation and energy dissipation capacity and for overstrength due to the redistribution of forces are derived by means of pushover analyses. As a result of the investigations, rationally based values of the behaviour factor q to be used in linear analyses in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 are proposed.