Refine
Year of publication
- 2005 (48) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (48) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (40)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Book (3)
- Other (1)
Keywords
- Bauingenieurwesen (3)
- CAD (3)
- civil engineering (3)
- Alternating plasticity (1)
- Analytischer Zulaessigkeitsnachweis (1)
- Axialbelastung (1)
- Axially cracked pipe (1)
- Deformation (1)
- Design-by-analysis (1)
- Einspiel-Analyse (1)
- Einspiel-Kriterium (1)
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (1)
- FEM (1)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (1)
- Global and local collapse (1)
- Grenzwertberechnung (1)
- Limit analysis (1)
- Plastizität (1)
- Pressure loaded crack-face (1)
- Progressive plastic deformation (1)
- Shakedown analysis (1)
- Shakedown criterion (1)
- Traglastanalyse (1)
- alternierend Verformbarkeit (1)
- fortschreitende plastische Deformation (1)
In: Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2005 2005, Part 4, 207-216, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3698-1_19 The conceptual design at the beginning of the building construction process is essential for the success of a building project. Even if some CAD tools allow elaborating conceptual sketches, they rather focus on the shape of the building elements and not on their functionality. We introduce semantic roomobjects and roomlinks, by way of example to the CAD tool ArchiCAD. These extensions provide a basis for specifying the organisation and functionality of a building and free architects being forced to directly produce detailed constructive sketches. Furthermore, we introduce consistency analyses of the conceptual sketch, based on an ontology containing conceptual relevant knowledge, specific to one class of buildings.
In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion.
Limit loads can be calculated with the finite element method (FEM) for any component, defect geometry, and loading. FEM suggests that published long crack limit formulae for axial defects under-estimate the burst pressure for internal surface defects in thick pipes while limit loads are not conservative for deep cracks and for pressure loaded crack-faces. Very deep cracks have a residual strength, which is modelled by a global collapse load. These observations are combined to derive new analytical local and global collapse loads. The global collapse loads are close to FEM limit analyses for all crack dimensions.