Conference Proceeding
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (302)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (259)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (243)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (209)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (208)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (167)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (152)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (139)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (73)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (62)
Language
- English (1170)
- German (477)
- Italian (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Spanish (1)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (1650) (remove)
Keywords
- Biosensor (25)
- Blitzschutz (15)
- CAD (11)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (11)
- civil engineering (11)
- Bauingenieurwesen (10)
- Lightning protection (9)
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (6)
- Telekommunikationsmarkt (6)
- shakedown analysis (6)
Das Technologiepraktikum „Virtuelle Sensor-Fertigung“ ist ein Beispiel für die medientechnische Aufbereitung von Lern- und Lehrmaterial unter didaktischen Gesichtspunkten. Studierende lernen einen Fertigungsprozess mit Hilfe von virtuellen Maschinen kennen, bevor sie die reale Prozesskette im Laborpraktikum im Reinraum durchführen.
Eine neue Generation von Praktika an Hochschulen wächst heran. Moderne Wege beim Verstehen und Erlernen naturwissenschaftlicher Zusammenhänge sowie industrieller Fertigungsprozesse sind gefordert. Das Technologiepraktikum „Virtuelle Sensor- Fertigung“, entwickelt im Verbundprojekt INGMEDIA an den Fachhochschulen Aachen und Zweibrücken, trägt als neuartiges Lern- und Lehrmodul dieser Forderung Rechnung. Die Studierenden lernen einen vollständigen Fertigungsprozess mit Hilfe von virtuellen, in LabVIEW programmierten Maschinen kennen, bevor sie die reale Prozesskette im Reinraum durchführen.
Close interrelations between sound and image are not a mere phenomenon of today’s multimedia technology. The idea of the synthesis of different media lies at the core of the concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk in the second half of the 19th century and it can also be traced back to the synaesthesia debate at the beginning of the 20th century [...].
This paper presents the direct route to Design by Analysis (DBA) of the new European pressure vessel standard in the language of limit and shakedown analysis (LISA). This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for some examples from the DBA-Manual. One observation from the examples is, that the optimisation approach gives reliable and close lower bound solutions leading to simple and optimised design decision.
Zur Bedeutung der Workload
(2005)
Safety and reliability of structures may be assessed indirectly by stress distributions. Limit and shakedown theorems are simplified but exact methods of plasticity that provide safety factors directly in the loading space. These theorems may be used for a direct definition of the limit state function for failure by plastic collapse or by inadaptation. In a FEM formulation the limit state function is obtained from a nonlinear optimization problem. This direct approach reduces considerably the necessary knowledge of uncertain technological input data, the computing time, and the numerical error. Moreover, the direct way leads to highly effective and precise reliability analyses. The theorems are implemented into a general purpose FEM program in a way capable of large-scale analysis.
Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model.