Article
Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (138) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (42)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (25)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (25)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (19)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (13)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (12)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (12)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (9)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (4)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (4)
Has Fulltext
- no (138) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (138) (remove)
Keywords
- Antarctic Glaciology (1)
- DNA hybridization (1)
- Extraterrestrial Glaciology (1)
- Field-effect sensor (1)
- Glaciological instruments and methods (1)
- LAPS (1)
- Light-addressable Potentiometric Sensor (1)
- Subclacial exploration (1)
- Subglacial lakes (1)
- SunRav BookEditor (1)
- adsorption (1)
- barium strontium titanate (1)
- bioavailability (1)
- carbonized rice husk (1)
- contactless conductivity sensor (1)
- distance learning (1)
- drug metabolising enzymes (1)
- drug–drug interactions (1)
- e-books (1)
- e-issues (1)
- elastomers (1)
- enzymatic (bio)degradation (1)
- field-effect sensor (1)
- high-k material (1)
- human metabolites (1)
- hydrogen peroxide (1)
- impedance spectroscopy (1)
- in-situ monitoring (1)
- lable-free detection (1)
- lipopolysaccharide (1)
- mechanical properties (1)
- multi-functional material (1)
- novel photoexcitation method (1)
- poly(d, l-lactic acid) (1)
- rubber (1)
- softs (1)
- spatial resolution (1)
- supramolecular structures (1)
- surface modification (1)
- theory and modeling (1)
- tilted constant illumination (1)
- transporters (1)
Use of textile structures for reinforcement of pelvic floor structures has to consider mechanical forces to the implant, which are quite different to the tension free conditions of the abdominal wall. Thus, biomechanical analysis of textile devices has to include the impact of strain on stretchability and effective porosity. Prolift® and Prolift + M®, developed for tension free conditions, were tested by measuring stretchability and effective porosity applying mechanical strain. For comparison, we used Dynamesh-PR4®, which was designed for pelvic floor repair to withstand mechanical strain. Prolift® at rest showed moderate porosity with little stretchability but complete loss of effective porosity at strain of 4.9 N/cm. Prolift + M® revealed an increased porosity at rest, but at strain showed high stretchability, with subsequent loss of effective porosity at strain of 2.5 N/cm. Dynamesh PR4® preserved its high porosity even under strain, but as consequence of limited stretchability. Though in tension free conditions Prolift® and Prolift + M® can be considered as large pore class I meshes, application of mechanical strain rapidly lead to collapse of pores. The loss of porosity at mechanical stress can be prevented by constructions with high structural stability. Assessment of porosity under strain was found helpful to define requirements for pelvic floor devices. Clinical studies have to prove whether devices with high porosity as well as high structural stability can improve the patients' outcome.