Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (14)
- 2023 (29)
- 2022 (19)
- 2021 (27)
- 2020 (29)
- 2019 (44)
- 2018 (44)
- 2017 (37)
- 2016 (35)
- 2015 (36)
- 2014 (43)
- 2013 (43)
- 2012 (40)
- 2011 (40)
- 2010 (37)
- 2009 (38)
- 2008 (41)
- 2007 (39)
- 2006 (27)
- 2005 (25)
- 2004 (35)
- 2003 (33)
- 2002 (29)
- 2001 (33)
- 2000 (34)
- 1999 (31)
- 1998 (28)
- 1997 (34)
- 1996 (25)
- 1995 (22)
- 1994 (21)
- 1993 (18)
- 1992 (13)
- 1991 (14)
- 1990 (9)
- 1989 (17)
- 1988 (11)
- 1987 (8)
- 1986 (9)
- 1985 (9)
- 1984 (3)
- 1983 (7)
- 1982 (4)
- 1981 (3)
- 1980 (12)
- 1979 (6)
- 1978 (7)
- 1977 (1)
- 1976 (7)
- 1975 (3)
- 1974 (4)
- 1973 (1)
- 1972 (3)
- 1971 (2)
- 1970 (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (1184) (remove)
Language
- English (718)
- German (465)
- Multiple languages (1)
Document Type
- Article (638)
- Conference Proceeding (302)
- Book (114)
- Part of a Book (64)
- Patent (17)
- Report (9)
- Other (8)
- Contribution to a Periodical (6)
- Course Material (6)
- Doctoral Thesis (6)
Keywords
- Multimediamarkt (7)
- Enterprise Architecture (5)
- MINLP (5)
- Engineering optimization (4)
- Gamification (4)
- Serious Game (4)
- Auslenkung (3)
- Digitale Transformation (3)
- Digitalisierung (3)
- Education (3)
Der Helium-Neon-Laser
(2003)
In this paper we present an extension of the action language Golog that allows for using fuzzy notions in non-deterministic argument choices and the reward function in decision-theoretic planning. Often, in decision-theoretic planning, it is cumbersome to specify the set of values to pick from in the non-deterministic-choice-of-argument statement. Also, even for domain experts, it is not always easy to specify a reward function. Instead of providing a finite domain for values in the non-deterministic-choice-of-argument statement in Golog, we now allow for stating the argument domain by simply providing a formula over linguistic terms and fuzzy uents. In Golog’s forward-search DT planning algorithm, these formulas are evaluated in order to find the agent’s optimal policy. We illustrate this in the Diner Domain where the agent needs to calculate the optimal serving order.
In this work, we report on our attempt to design and implement an early introduction to basic robotics principles for children at kindergarten age. One of the main challenges of this effort is to explain complex robotics contents in a way that pre-school children could follow the basic principles and ideas using examples from their world of experience. What sets apart our effort from other work is that part of the lecturing is actually done by a robot itself and that a quiz at the end of the lesson is done using robots as well. The humanoid robot Pepper from Softbank, which is a great platform for human–robot interaction experiments, was used to present a lecture on robotics by reading out the contents to the children making use of its speech synthesis capability. A quiz in a Runaround-game-show style after the lecture activated the children to recap the contents they acquired about how mobile robots work in principle. In this quiz, two LEGO Mindstorm EV3 robots were used to implement a strongly interactive scenario. Besides the thrill of being exposed to a mobile robot that would also react to the children, they were very excited and at the same time very concentrated. We got very positive feedback from the children as well as from their educators. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of only few attempts to use a robot like Pepper not as a tele-teaching tool, but as the teacher itself in order to engage pre-school children with complex robotics contents.
Reasoning with Qualitative Positional Information for Domestic Domains in the Situation Calculus
(2011)
In this paper we present CAESAR, an intelligent domestic service robot. In domestic settings for service robots complex tasks have to be accomplished. Those tasks benefit from deliberation, from robust action execution and from flexible methods for human–robot interaction that account for qualitative notions used in natural language as well as human fallibility. Our robot CAESAR deploys AI techniques on several levels of its system architecture. On the low-level side, system modules for localization or navigation make, for instance, use of path-planning methods, heuristic search, and Bayesian filters. For face recognition and human–machine interaction, random trees and well-known methods from natural language processing are deployed. For deliberation, we use the robot programming and plan language READYLOG, which was developed for the high-level control of agents and robots; it allows combining programming the behaviour using planning to find a course of action. READYLOG is a variant of the robot programming language Golog. We extended READYLOG to be able to cope with qualitative notions of space frequently used by humans, such as “near” and “far”. This facilitates human–robot interaction by bridging the gap between human natural language and the numerical values needed by the robot. Further, we use READYLOG to increase the flexible interpretation of human commands with decision-theoretic planning. We give an overview of the different methods deployed in CAESAR and show the applicability of a system equipped with these AI techniques in domestic service robotics
Purpose
To assess potential cognitive deficits under the influence of static magnetic fields at various field strengths some studies already exist. These studies were not focused on attention as the most vulnerable cognitive function. Additionally, mostly no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were performed.
Materials and Methods
In all, 25 right-handed men were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent one MRI examination of 63 minutes at 1.5 T and one at 7 T within an interval of 10 to 30 days. The order of the examinations was randomized. Subjects were referred to six standardized neuropsychological tests strictly focused on attention immediately before and after each MRI examination. Differences in neuropsychological variables between the timepoints before and after each MRI examination were assessed and P-values were calculated
Results
Only six subtests revealed significant differences between pre- and post-MRI. In these tests the subjects achieved better results in post-MRI testing than in pre-MRI testing (P = 0.013–0.032). The other tests revealed no significant results.
Conclusion
The improvement in post-MRI testing is only explicable as a result of learning effects. MRI examinations, even in ultrahigh-field scanners, do not seem to have any persisting influence on the attention networks of human cognition immediately after exposure.