Refine
Year of publication
- 2005 (130) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (99)
- Conference Proceeding (23)
- Book (5)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Lecture (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- English (130) (remove)
Keywords
- Bauingenieurwesen (2)
- CAD (2)
- civil engineering (2)
- Alternating plasticity (1)
- Analytischer Zulaessigkeitsnachweis (1)
- Axialbelastung (1)
- Axially cracked pipe (1)
- Deformation (1)
- Design-by-analysis (1)
- Einspiel-Analyse (1)
- Einspiel-Kriterium (1)
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (1)
- Energietechnik (1)
- Energy (1)
- Energy Systems (1)
- Evolutionary Neurocontrol (1)
- FEM (1)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (1)
- Global and local collapse (1)
- Grenzwertberechnung (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (40)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (27)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (23)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (19)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (15)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (15)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (10)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (8)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (5)
- Freshman Institute (4)
- Fachbereich Architektur (1)
- Nowum-Energy (1)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (1)
In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion.