Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (14)
- 2022 (37)
- 2021 (23)
- 2020 (34)
- 2019 (27)
- 2018 (22)
- 2017 (27)
- 2016 (17)
- 2015 (23)
- 2014 (40)
- 2013 (36)
- 2012 (20)
- 2011 (26)
- 2010 (31)
- 2009 (35)
- 2008 (28)
- 2007 (24)
- 2006 (29)
- 2005 (39)
- 2004 (35)
- 2003 (25)
- 2002 (33)
- 2001 (27)
- 2000 (35)
- 1999 (28)
- 1998 (28)
- 1997 (31)
- 1996 (44)
- 1995 (24)
- 1994 (30)
- 1993 (23)
- 1992 (17)
- 1991 (11)
- 1990 (11)
- 1989 (16)
- 1988 (16)
- 1987 (20)
- 1986 (20)
- 1985 (16)
- 1984 (14)
- 1983 (14)
- 1982 (10)
- 1981 (14)
- 1980 (7)
- 1979 (9)
- 1978 (3)
- 1977 (3)
- 1976 (1)
- 1975 (4)
- 1974 (1)
- 1973 (1)
- 1972 (1)
Document Type
- Article (608)
- Conference Proceeding (259)
- Book (125)
- Part of a Book (83)
- Doctoral Thesis (10)
- Report (7)
- Other (4)
- Talk (3)
- Diploma Thesis (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Poster (1)
Language
- English (579)
- German (522)
- Multiple languages (1)
- nld (1)
- Spanish (1)
Keywords
- Blitzschutz (18)
- Lightning protection (11)
- Earthquake (5)
- Diversity Management (4)
- Energy storage (4)
- Power plants (4)
- Risikomanagement (4)
- Seismic design (4)
- reinforced concrete (4)
- Associated liquids (3)
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Elektromagnetischer Schutzschild (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
- INODIS (3)
- Lightning (3)
- Out-of-plane load (3)
- Risikoabschätzung (3)
- Risk management (3)
- Seismic loading (3)
- Stahlbetonkonstruktion (3)
Institute
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (1104) (remove)
For typical cases of non-isolated lightning
protection systems (LPS) the impulse currents are investigated which may flow through a human body directly touching a structural part of the LPS. Based on a basic LPS model with conventional down-conductors especially the cases of external and internal steel columns and metal façades are considered and compared. Numerical simulations of the line quantities voltages and currents in the time domain are performed with an equivalent circuit of the entire LPS.
As a result it can be stated that by increasing the number of conventional down-conductors and external steel columns the threat for a human being can indeed be reduced, but not down to an acceptable limit. In case of internal steel columns used as natural down-conductors the threat can be reduced sufficiently, depending on the low-resistive connection of the steel columns to the lightning equipotential bonding or the earth termination system, resp. If a metal façade is used the threat for human beings touching is usually very low, if the façade is sufficiently interconnected and multiply connected to the lightning equipotential bonding or the earth termination system, resp.
Blitzschutz
(1993)
In the paper the results obtained from experiments at a modelled reinforced building in case of a direct lightning strike are compared with calculations. The comparison includes peak values of the magnetic field Hmax, its derivative (dH/dt)max and of induced voltages umax in typical cable routings. The experiments are performed at a 1:6 scaled building and the results are extrapolated using the similarity relations theory. The calculations are based on the approximate formulae given in IEC 62305-4 and have to be supplemented by a rough estimation of the additional shielding effect of a second reinforcement layer. The comparison shows, that the measured peak values of the magnetic field and its derivative are mostly lower than the calculated. The induced voltages are in good agreement. Hence, calculations of the induced voltages based on IEC 62305-4 are a good method for lightning protection studies of buildings, where the reinforcement is used as a grid-like electromagnetic shield.
In the presented paper data collected from the field related to damage statistics of electrical and electronic apparatus in household are reported and investigated. These damages (total number approx. 74000 cases), registered by five German insurance companies in 2005 and 2006, were adviced by customers as caused by lightning overvoltages. With the use of stochastical methods it is possible, to reasses the collected data and to distinguish between cases, which are with high probability caused by lightning overvoltages, and those, which are not. If there was an indication for a direct strike, this case was excluded, so the focus was only on indirect lightning flashes, i.e. only flashes to ground near the structure and flashes to or nearby an incoming service line were investigated. The data from the field contain the location of damaged apparatus (residence of the policy holder) and the distances of the nearest cloud-to-ground stroke to the location of the damage registered by the German lightning location network BLIDS at the date of damage. The statistical data along with some complementary numerical simulations allow to verify the correspondence of the Standards rules used for IEC 62305-2 with the field data and to define some correction needs. The results could lead to a better understanding whether a damage reported to an insurance company is really caused by indirect lightning, or not.
Risk management for structures with a risk of explosion should be considered very carefully when performing a risk analysis according to IEC 62305-2. In contrast to the 2006 edition of the standard, the 2010 edition describes the topic “Structures with a risk of explosion” in more detail. Moreover, in Germany separate procedures and parameters are defined for the risk analysis of structures with a risk of explosion (Supplement 3 of the German DIN EN 62305-2 standard). This paper describes the contents and the relevant calculations of this Supplement 3, together with a numerical example.
[Paper of the X International Symposium on Lightning Protection 9th - 13th November, 2009 - Curitiba, Brazil. 6 pages] The international standard IEC 62305-3, published in 2006, requires as an integral part of the lightning protection system (LPS) the consideration of a separation distance between the conductors of the LPS and metal and electrical installations inside the structure to be protected. IEC 62305-3 gives two different methods for this calculation: a standard, simplified approach and a more detailed approach, which differ especially regarding the treatment of the current sharing effect on the LPS conductors. Hence, different results for the separation distance are possible, leading to some discrepancies in the use of the standard. The standard approach defined in the main part (Clause 6.3) and in Annex C of the standard in some cases may lead to a severe oversizing of the required separation distance. The detailed approach described in Annex E naturally gives more correct results. However, a calculation of the current sharing amongst all parts of the air-termination and downconductor network is necessary, in many cases requiring the use of network analysis programs. In this paper simplified methods for the assessment of the current sharing are presented, which are easy to use as well as sufficiently adequate.