Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (255) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (66)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (37)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (34)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (33)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (32)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (27)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (27)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (23)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (14)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (12)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (12)
- Fachbereich Architektur (10)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (6)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (6)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (5)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (4)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (2)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (1)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (1)
- Nowum-Energy (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (255) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (108)
- Conference Proceeding (85)
- Part of a Book (33)
- Book (13)
- Other (11)
- Report (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Patent (1)
Keywords
- Autonomous mobile robots (2)
- Gamification (2)
- Industry 4.0 (2)
- MASCOT (2)
- Multi-robot systems (2)
- Smart factory (2)
- 3D nonlinear finite element model (1)
- Acceptance tests (1)
- Ausfachungsmauerwerk (1)
- Automated Optimization (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (255)
Genetically humanized mice for proteins involved in drug metabolism and toxicity and mice engrafted with human hepatocytes are emerging as promising in vivo models for improved prediction of the pharmacokinetic, drug–drug interaction, and safety characteristics of compounds in humans. This is an overview on the genetically humanized and chimeric liver-humanized mouse models, which are illustrated with examples of their utility in drug metabolism and toxicity studies. The models are compared to give guidance for selection of the most appropriate model by highlighting advantages and disadvantages to be carefully considered when used for studies in drug discovery and development.
Hotelling’s T² tests in paired and independent survey samples are compared using the traditional asymptotic efficiency concepts of Hodges–Lehmann, Bahadur and Pitman, as well as through criteria based on the volumes of corresponding confidence regions. Conditions characterizing the superiority of a procedure are given in terms of population canonical correlation type coefficients. Statistical tests for checking these conditions are developed. Test statistics based on the eigenvalues of a symmetrized sample cross-covariance matrix are suggested, as well as test statistics based on sample canonical correlation type coefficients.