Conference Proceeding
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (234)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (210)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (183)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (177)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (148)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (110)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (107)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (75)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (52)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (51)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (46)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (39)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (24)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (17)
- Nowum-Energy (11)
- Fachbereich Architektur (7)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (4)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (2)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (2)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (2)
- Digitalisierung in Studium & Lehre (1)
- Freshman Institute (1)
- IaAM - Institut für angewandte Automation und Mechatronik (1)
- Kommission für Planung und Finanzen (1)
- Senat (1)
Language
- English (1162) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (1162) (remove)
Keywords
- Biosensor (25)
- CAD (7)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (7)
- civil engineering (7)
- Bauingenieurwesen (6)
- Blitzschutz (6)
- Enterprise Architecture (5)
- Clusterion (4)
- Energy storage (4)
- Gamification (4)
Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model.
Solar sailcraft provide a wide range of opportunities for high-energy low-cost missions. To date, most mission studies require a rather demanding performance that will not be realized by solar sailcraft of the first generation.
However, even with solar sailcraft of moderate performance, scientifically relevant missions are feasible. This is demonstrated with a Near Earth Asteroid sample return mission and various planetary rendezvous missions.