Article
Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (4)
- 2023 (9)
- 2022 (5)
- 2021 (11)
- 2020 (17)
- 2019 (12)
- 2018 (7)
- 2017 (9)
- 2016 (11)
- 2015 (6)
- 2014 (4)
- 2013 (5)
- 2012 (3)
- 2011 (9)
- 2010 (13)
- 2009 (9)
- 2008 (10)
- 2007 (15)
- 2006 (15)
- 2005 (28)
- 2004 (13)
- 2003 (13)
- 2002 (16)
- 2001 (10)
- 2000 (10)
- 1999 (10)
- 1998 (10)
- 1997 (4)
- 1996 (7)
- 1995 (7)
- 1994 (8)
- 1993 (5)
- 1992 (8)
- 1991 (8)
- 1990 (7)
- 1989 (4)
- 1988 (7)
- 1987 (5)
- 1986 (1)
- 1985 (7)
- 1984 (6)
Institute
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (368) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (368) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (368) (remove)
Keywords
- avalanche (5)
- snow (3)
- Drinfeld modules (2)
- Transcendence (2)
- t-modules (2)
- 1P hub loads (1)
- Active humidity control (1)
- Aeroelasticity (1)
- Antarctic Glaciology (1)
- Avalanche (1)
Testing of a 10 kW diffusive micro-mix combustor for hydrogen-fuelled micro-scale gas turbines
(2007)
Using results from an 8 m2 instrumented force plate we describe field measurements of normal and shear stresses, and fluid pore pressure for a debris flow. The flow depth increased from 0.1 to 1 m within the first 12 s of flow front arrival, remained relatively constant until 100 s, and then gradually decreased to 0.5 m by 600 s. Normal and shear stresses and pore fluid pressure varied in-phase with the flow depth. Calculated bulk densities are ρb = 2000–2250 kg m−3 for the bulk flow and ρf = 1600–1750 kg m−3 for the fluid phase. The ratio of effective normal stress to shear stress yields a Coulomb basal friction angle of ϕ = 26° at the flow front. We did not find a strong correlation between the degree of agitation in the flow, estimated using the signal from a geophone on the force plate, and an assumed dynamic pore fluid pressure. Our data support the idea that excess pore-fluid pressures are long lived in debris flows and therefore contribute to their unusual mobility.
Solar Sail Kinetic Energy Impactor Trajectory Optimization for an Asteroid-Deflection Mission
(2007)
The powerful avalanche simulation toolbox RAMMS (Rapid Mass Movements) is based on a depth-averaged
hydrodynamic system of equations with a Voellmy-Salm friction relation. The two empirical friction parameters
μ and correspond to a dry Coulomb friction and a viscous resistance, respectively. Although μ and lack a
proper physical explanation, 60 years of acquired avalanche data in the Swiss Alps made a systematic calibration
possible. RAMMS can therefore successfully model avalanche flow depth, velocities, impact pressure and run
out distances. Pudasaini and Hutter (2003) have proposed extended, rigorously derived model equations that
account for local curvature and twist. A coordinate transformation into a reference system, applied to the actual
mountain topography of the natural avalanche path, is performed. The local curvature and the twist of the
avalanche path induce an additional term in the overburden pressure. This leads to a modification of the Coulomb
friction, the free-surface pressure gradient, the pressure induced by the channel, and the gravity components
along and normal to the curved and twisted reference surface. This eventually guides the flow dynamics and
deposits of avalanches. In the present study, we investigate the influence of curvature on avalanche flow in
real mountain terrain. Simulations of real avalanche paths are performed and compared for the different models
approaches. An algorithm to calculate curvature in real terrain is introduced in RAMMS. This leads to a curvature
dependent friction relation in an extended version of the Voellmy-Salm model equations. Our analysis provides
yet another step in interpreting the physical meaning and significance of the friction parameters used in the
RAMMS computational environment.
Two- and three-dimensional avalanche dynamics models are being increasingly used in hazard-mitigation studies. These models can provide improved and more accurate results for hazard mapping than the simple one-dimensional models presently used in practice. However, two- and three-dimensional models generate an extensive amount of output data, making the interpretation of simulation results more difficult. To perform a simulation in three-dimensional terrain, numerical models require a digital elevation model, specification of avalanche release areas (spatial extent and volume), selection of solution methods, finding an adequate calculation resolution and, finally, the choice of friction parameters. In this paper, the importance and difficulty of correctly setting up and analysing the results of a numerical avalanche dynamics simulation is discussed. We apply the two-dimensional simulation program RAMMS to the 1968 extreme avalanche event In den Arelen. We show the effect of model input variations on simulation results and the dangers and complexities in their interpretation.