Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (207) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (207) (remove)
Language
- English (207) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (114)
- Conference Proceeding (43)
- Book (32)
- Part of a Book (15)
- Working Paper (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- rebound-effect (2)
- sustainability (2)
- Active learning (1)
- Bank-issued Warrants (1)
- Brands (1)
- Business Models (1)
- Business Process Intelligence (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Challenges (1)
- Change (1)
Providing healthcare services frequently involves cognitively demanding tasks, including diagnoses and analyses as well as complex decisions about treatments and therapy. From a global perspective, ethically significant inequalities exist between regions where the expert knowledge required for these tasks is scarce or abundant. One possible strategy to diminish such inequalities and increase healthcare opportunities in expert-scarce settings is to provide healthcare solutions involving digital technologies that do not necessarily require the presence of a human expert, e.g., in the form of artificial intelligent decision-support systems (AI-DSS). Such algorithmic decision-making, however, is mostly developed in resource- and expert-abundant settings to support healthcare experts in their work. As a practical consequence, the normative standards and requirements for such algorithmic decision-making in healthcare require the technology to be at least as explainable as the decisions made by the experts themselves. The goal of providing healthcare in settings where resources and expertise are scarce might come with a normative pull to lower the normative standards of using digital technologies in order to provide at least some healthcare in the first place. We scrutinize this tendency to lower standards in particular settings from a normative perspective, distinguish between different types of absolute and relative, local and global standards of explainability, and conclude by defending an ambitious and practicable standard of local relative explainability.
Outlier Robust Estimation of an Euler Equation Investment Model with German Firm Level Panel Data
(2002)
Goal Driven Business Modelling - Supporting Decision Making within Information System Development
(1995)
Info-Web-Generation
(2004)
Introduction of RePriCo’13
(2013)
Prioritization is an essential task within requirements engineering to cope with complexity and to establish focus properly. The 3rd Workshop on Requirements Prioritization for customer oriented Software Development (RePriCo’12) focused on requirements prioritization and adjacent themes in the context of customer oriented development of bespoke and standard software. Five submissions have been accepted for the proceedings and for presentation. The report summarizes and points out key findings.