Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (2)
- 2023 (14)
- 2022 (11)
- 2021 (18)
- 2020 (30)
- 2019 (35)
- 2018 (21)
- 2017 (32)
- 2016 (30)
- 2015 (42)
- 2014 (41)
- 2013 (32)
- 2012 (42)
- 2011 (34)
- 2010 (41)
- 2009 (43)
- 2008 (43)
- 2007 (42)
- 2006 (42)
- 2005 (27)
- 2004 (31)
- 2003 (30)
- 2002 (29)
- 2001 (28)
- 2000 (37)
- 1999 (50)
- 1998 (40)
- 1997 (33)
- 1996 (19)
- 1995 (25)
- 1994 (23)
- 1993 (22)
- 1992 (22)
- 1991 (11)
- 1990 (23)
- 1989 (10)
- 1988 (5)
- 1987 (7)
- 1986 (11)
- 1985 (3)
- 1984 (4)
- 1983 (2)
- 1982 (1)
- 1981 (2)
- 1980 (1)
- 1979 (1)
- 1978 (1)
- 1977 (2)
- 1975 (1)
- 1974 (1)
- 1973 (1)
- 1971 (1)
- 1963 (1)
Document Type
- Article (683)
- Book (214)
- Part of a Book (69)
- Conference Proceeding (53)
- Other (46)
- Review (13)
- Working Paper (6)
- Contribution to a Periodical (5)
- Doctoral Thesis (5)
- Report (4)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Talk (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (1100) (remove)
Keywords
- Datenschutz (5)
- Datenschutzgrundverordnung (3)
- Datenschutzrecht (2)
- EU-Datenschutzgrundverordnung (2)
- Internationales Recht / Europarecht (2)
- 3. EU Legislativpaket (1)
- Active learning (1)
- Atomausstieg (1)
- Bank-issued Warrants (1)
- Betroffenenrechte (1)
- Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (2017) (1)
- Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1)
- Business Models (1)
- Business Process Intelligence (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Challenges (1)
- Clinical decision support systems (1)
- Cloud Computing (1)
- Consensus (1)
- Cross-platform (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1100) (remove)
The construction of a statistical test is investigated which is based only on “reliability” and “precision” as quality criteria. The reliability of a statistical test is quantifiedin a straightforward way by the probability that the decision of the test is correct. However, the quantification of the precision of a statistical test is not at all evident. Thereforethe paper presents and discusses several approaches. Moreover the distinction of “nullhypothesis” and “alternative hypothesis” is not necessary any longer.
By developing innovative solutions to social and environmental problems, sustainable ventures carry greatpotential. Entrepreneurship which focuses especially on new venture creation can be developed through education anduniversities, in particular, are called upon to provide an impetus for social change. But social innovations are associatedwith certain hurdles, which are related to the multi-dimensionality, i.e. the tension between creating social,environmental and economic value and dealing with a multiplicity of stakeholders. The already complex field ofentrepreneurship education has to face these challenges. This paper, therefore, aims to identify starting points for theintegration of sustainability into entrepreneurship education. To pursue this goal experiences from three differentproject initiatives between the partner universities: Lapland University of Applied Sciences, FH Aachen University ofApplied Sciences and Turiba University are reflected and findings are systematically condensed into recommendationsfor education on sustainable entrepreneurship.
Mit der Verabschiedung der Europäischen Güterrechtsverordnung für Ehegatten und eingetragene Partner hat der Unionsgesetzgeber die Vereinheitlichung des Kollisionsrechts in Europa weiter vorangetrieben. Zentraler Baustein beider Rechtsakte ist die Parteiautonomie, die mit Blick auf Eheleute an bewährte Traditionen anknüpft, für Lebenspartner aber eine echte Neuerung bringt.
The case for a more binding WTO agreement on regulatory principles in telecommunication markets
(1999)
Digital start-ups are perceived as an engine for innovation and job promotor. While success factors for non-IT start-ups have already been extensively researched, this study sheds light on digital entrepreneurs, whose business model relies primarily on services based on digital technologies. Applying the Grounded Theory method, we identify relevant environmental success factors for digital entrepreneurs. The study’s research contribution is threefold. First, we provide 16 relevant and less relevant environmental success factors, which enables a comparison with prior identified factors. We found out that several prior environmental success factors, such as accessibility to transportation or the availability of land and facilities are less relevant for a digital entrepreneur. Second, we derive and discuss hypotheses for the influence of these factors on digital start-up success. Third, we present a theoretical model that lays the foundation for explaining the environmental influence on digital
entrepreneurship success.