Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (194) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (64)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (40)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (38)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (30)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (20)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (19)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (16)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (11)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (8)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (8)
Language
- English (194) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (95)
- Conference Proceeding (74)
- Part of a Book (15)
- Book (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (2)
- Talk (1)
Keywords
- Enterprise Architecture (2)
- Seismic design (2)
- Achilles tendon (1)
- Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS/AD) (1)
- Aircraft design (1)
- Analytics (1)
- Architectural gear ratio (1)
- Assistive technology (1)
- Automatic control (1)
- BEV (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Change Management (1)
- Combustion (1)
- Components (1)
- Corporate Culture (1)
- Correlations (1)
- Decentral (1)
- Design examples (1)
- Design rules (1)
- Digital Age (1)
- Diversity Management (1)
- Drag (1)
- Earthquake (1)
- Emilia-Romagna earthquake (1)
- Empirical consequence curves (1)
- Empirical fragility functions (1)
- Engineering (1)
- Engineering optimization (1)
- Eurocode 8 (1)
- Force (1)
- Gearbox (1)
- Geometry (1)
- Goodness-of-fit test (1)
- Graph Theory (1)
- Green aircraft (1)
- Gust wind response (1)
- Human-Computer interaction (1)
- Hybrid-electric aircraft (1)
- Hydrogen (1)
- ISO 26262 (1)
- In-plane (1)
- Industrial units (1)
- Innovation Management (1)
- Isolation (1)
- Iterative learning control (1)
- Knee (1)
- Load modeling (1)
- Low NOx (1)
- Low emission (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Mechanical (1)
- Mixed-integer nonlinear black-box optimization (1)
- Multi-sample problem (1)
- On-site (1)
- Optimization (1)
- Out-of-plane (1)
- PBEE (1)
- Parametric bootstrap (1)
- Powertrain (1)
- Pre-treatment (1)
- Precast buildings (1)
- Preface (1)
- Product family optimization (1)
- Pushover analysis (1)
- Rehabilitation engineering (1)
- Resilience Assessment (1)
- Response spectrum (1)
- Robotic Process Automation (1)
- Running (1)
- Safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF) (1)
- Safety-critical systems validation (1)
- Seismic (1)
- Silos (1)
- Software Robots (1)
- Spectral analysis (1)
- Statistics (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Tanks (1)
- Tendon properties (1)
- Training (1)
- Unmanned Air Vehicle (1)
- Volume of confidence regions (1)
- WLTP (1)
- Water Supply System (1)
- Wind turbulence (1)
- asymptotic relative efficiency (1)
- concentrating collector (1)
- frequency mixing magnetic detection (1)
- likelihood ratio test (1)
- magnetic actuation (1)
- magnetic sandwich immunoassay (1)
- magnetic separation (1)
- magnetic tweezers (1)
- magnetophoretic velocity (1)
- multinomial distribution (1)
- multiparametric immunoassays (1)
- multivariate normal distribution (1)
- point-focussing system (1)
- raytracing (1)
- responsive space (1)
- small solar system body characterisation (1)
- small spacecraft asteroid lander (1)
- small spacecraft solar sail (1)
- solar process heat (1)
- superparamagnetic bead (1)
- system engineering (1)
In parallel to the evolution of the Planetary Defense Conference, the exploration of small solar system bodies has advanced from fast fly-bys on the sidelines of missions to the planets to the implementation of dedicated sample-return and in-situ analysis missions. Spacecraft of all sizes have landed, touch-and-go sampled, been gently beached, or impacted at hypervelocity on asteroid and comet surfaces. More have flown by close enough to image their surfaces in detail or sample their immediate environment, often as part of an extended or re-purposed mission. And finally, full-scale planetary defense experiment missions are in the making. Highly efficient low-thrust propulsion is increasingly applied beyond commercial use also in mainstream and flagship science missions, in combination with gravity assist propulsion. Another development in the same years is the growth of small spacecraft solutions, not in size but in numbers and individual capabilities. The on-going NASA OSIRIS-REx and JAXA HAYABUSA2 missions exemplify the trend as well as the upcoming NEA SCOUT mission or the landers MINERVA-II and MASCOT recently deployed on Ryugu. We outline likely as well as possible and efficient routes of continuation of all these developments towards a propellant-less and highly efficient class of spacecraft for small solar system body exploration: small spacecraft solar sails designed for carefree handling and equipped with carried landers and application modules, for all asteroid user communities –planetary science, planetary defence, and in-situ resource utilization. This projection builds on the experience gained in the development of deployable membrane structures leading up to the successful ground deployment test of a (20 m)² solar sail at DLR Cologne and in the 20 years since. It draws on the background of extensive trajectory optimization studies, the qualified technology of the DLR GOSSAMER-1 deployment demonstrator, and the MASCOT asteroid lander. These enable ‘now-term’ as well as near-term hardware solutions, and thus responsive fast-paced development. Mission types directly applicable to planetary defense include: single and Multiple NEA Rendezvous ((M)NR) for mitigation precursor, target monitoring and deflection follow-up tasks; sail-propelled head-on retrograde kinetic impactors (RKI) for mitigation; and deployable membrane based methods to modify the asteroid’s properties or interact with it. The DLR-ESTEC GOSSAMER Roadmap initiated studies of missions uniquely feasible with solar sails such as Displaced L1 (DL1) space weather advance warning and monitoring and Solar Polar Orbiter (SPO) delivery which demonstrate the capability of near-term solar sails to achieve NEA rendezvous in any kind of orbit, from Earth-coorbital to extremely inclined and even retrograde orbits. For those mission types using separable payloads, such as SPO, (M)NR and RKI, design concepts can be derived from the separable Boom Sail Deployment Units characteristic of DLR GOSSAMER solar sail technology, nanolanders like MASCOT, or microlanders like the JAXA-DLR Jupiter Trojan Asteroid Lander for the OKEANOS mission which can shuttle from the sail to the asteroids visited and enable multiple NEA sample-return missions. These are an ideal match for solar sails in micro-spacecraft format whose launch configurations are compatible with ESPA and ASAP secondary payload platforms.
Industrial units consist of the primary load-carrying structure and various process engineering components, the latter being by far the most important in financial terms. In addition, supply structures such as free-standing tanks and silos are usually required for each plant to ensure the supply of material and product storage. Thus, for the earthquake-proof design of industrial plants, design and construction rules are required for the primary structures, the secondary structures and the supply structures. Within the framework of these rules, possible interactions of primary and secondary structures must also be taken into account. Importance factors are used in seismic design in order to take into account the usually higher risk potential of an industrial unit compared to conventional building structures. Industrial facilities must be able to withstand seismic actions because of possibly wide-ranging damage consequences in addition to losses due to production standstill and the destruction of valuable equipment. The chapter presents an integrated concept for the seismic design of industrial units based on current seismic standards and the latest research results. Special attention is devoted to the seismic design of steel thin-walled silos and tank structures.
The 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquake, that mainly struck the homonymous Italian region provoking 28 casualties and damage to thousands of structures and infrastructures, is an exceptional source of information to question, investigate, and challenge the validity of seismic fragility functions and loss curves from an empirical standpoint. Among the most recent seismic events taking place in Europe, that of Emilia-Romagna is quite likely one of the best documented, not only in terms of experienced damages, but also for what concerns occurred losses and necessary reconstruction costs. In fact, in order to manage the compensations in a fair way both to citizens and business owners, soon after the seismic sequence, the regional administrative authority started (1) collecting damage and consequence-related data, (2) evaluating information sources and (3) taking care of the cross-checking of various reports. A specific database—so-called Sistema Informativo Gestione Europa (SFINGE)—was devoted to damaged business activities. As a result, 7 years after the seismic events, scientists can rely on a one-of-a-kind, vast and consistent database, containing information about (among other things): (1) buildings’ location and dimensions, (2) occurred structural damages, (3) experienced direct economic losses and (4) related reconstruction costs. The present work is focused on a specific data subset of SFINGE, whose elements are Long-Span-Beam buildings (mostly precast) deployed for business activities in industry, trade or agriculture. With the available set of data, empirical fragility functions, cost and loss ratio curves are elaborated, that may be included within existing Performance Based Earthquake Engineering assessment toolkits.