Article
Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (1359)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (503)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (472)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (414)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (411)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (361)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (254)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (149)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (116)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (69)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (43)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (32)
- Sonstiges (21)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (20)
- Nowum-Energy (18)
- Freshman Institute (17)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (15)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (12)
- Fachbereich Architektur (11)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (5)
- IMP - Institut für Mikrowellen- und Plasmatechnik (3)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (2)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (2)
- FH Aachen (1)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (1)
- Kommission für Planung und Finanzen (1)
- Senat (1)
Language
- English (3282) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3282) (remove)
Keywords
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (7)
- avalanche (5)
- Earthquake (4)
- FEM (4)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (4)
- LAPS (4)
- biosensors (4)
- field-effect sensor (4)
- frequency mixing magnetic detection (4)
- CellDrum (3)
A network of brain areas is expected to be involved in supporting the motion aftereffect. The most active components of this network were determined by means of an fMRI study of nine subjects exposed to a visual stimulus of moving bars producing the effect. Across the subjects, common areas were identified during various stages of the effect, as well as networks of areas specific to a single stage. In addition to the well-known motion-sensitive area MT the prefrontal brain areas BA44 and 47 and the cingulate gyrus, as well as posterior sites such as BA37 and BA40, were important components during the period of the motion aftereffect experience. They appear to be involved in control circuitry for selecting which of a number of processing styles is appropriate. The experimental fMRI results of the activation levels and their time courses for the various areas are explored. Correlation analysis shows that there are effectively two separate and weakly coupled networks involved in the total process. Implications of the results for awareness of the effect itself are briefly considered in the final discussion.