Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (1393) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (1393) (remove)
Keywords
- Enterprise Architecture (5)
- Gamification (5)
- Energy storage (4)
- Natural language processing (4)
- Power plants (4)
- hydrogen (4)
- solar sail (4)
- Associated liquids (3)
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
- MASCOT (3)
- Out-of-plane load (3)
- Serious Game (3)
- earthquakes (3)
- Additive manufacturing (2)
- Adjacent buildings (2)
- BIM (2)
- Case Study (2)
- Clustering (2)
- Deep learning (2)
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (280)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (226)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (192)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (188)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (164)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (148)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (113)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (101)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (57)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (53)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (44)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (41)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (33)
- Nowum-Energy (22)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (16)
- Fachbereich Architektur (13)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (8)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (3)
- IaAM - Institut für angewandte Automation und Mechatronik (3)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (2)
Finding a good system topology with more than a handful of components is a
highly non-trivial task. The system needs to be able to fulfil all expected load cases, but at the
same time the components should interact in an energy-efficient way. An example for a system
design problem is the layout of the drinking water supply of a residential building. It may be
reasonable to choose a design of spatially distributed pumps which are connected by pipes in at
least two dimensions. This leads to a large variety of possible system topologies. To solve such
problems in a reasonable time frame, the nonlinear technical characteristics must be modelled
as simple as possible, while still achieving a sufficiently good representation of reality. The
aim of this paper is to compare the speed and reliability of a selection of leading mathematical
programming solvers on a set of varying model formulations. This gives us empirical evidence
on what combinations of model formulations and solver packages are the means of choice with the current state of the art.
Innovative interplanetary deep space missions, like a main belt asteroid sample
return mission, require ever larger velocity increments (∆V s) and thus ever
more demanding propulsion capabilities. Providing much larger exhaust velocities than chemical high-thrust systems, electric low-thrust space-propulsion
systems can significantly enhance or even enable such high-energy missions. In
1995, a European-Russian Joint Study Group (JSG) presented a study report
on “Advanced Interplanetary Missions Using Nuclear-Electric Propulsion”
(NEP). One of the investigated reference missions was a sample return (SR)
from the main belt asteroid (19) Fortuna. The envisaged nuclear power plant,
Topaz-25, however, could not be realized and also the worldwide developments
in space reactor hardware stalled. In this paper, we investigate, whether such
a mission is also feasible using a solar electric propulsion (SEP) system and
compare our SEP results to corresponding NEP results.