Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (132)
- Conference Proceeding (62)
- Part of a Book (13)
- Book (4)
- Lecture (3)
- Other (3)
- Report (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Patent (1)
- Review (1)
Keywords
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (16)
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (13)
- shakedown analysis (9)
- FEM (6)
- Limit analysis (6)
- Shakedown analysis (6)
- limit analysis (6)
- Einspielanalyse (4)
- Shakedown (4)
- Technische Mechanik (4)
- Traglast (4)
- Traglastanalyse (4)
- shakedown (4)
- ratchetting (3)
- Analytischer Zulaessigkeitsnachweis (2)
- Biocomposites (2)
- Bruchmechanik (2)
- Druckbeanspruchung (2)
- Druckbehälter (2)
- Druckbelastung (2)
Direct methods comprising limit and shakedown analysis is a branch of computational mechanics. It plays a significant role in mechanical and civil engineering design. The concept of direct method aims to determinate the ultimate load bearing capacity of structures beyond the elastic range. For practical problems, the direct methods lead to nonlinear convex optimization problems with a large number of variables and onstraints. If strength and loading are random quantities, the problem of shakedown analysis is considered as stochastic programming. This paper presents a method so called chance constrained programming, an effective method of stochastic programming, to solve shakedown analysis problem under random condition of strength. In this our investigation, the loading is deterministic, the strength is distributed as normal or lognormal variables.
Limit and shakedown theorems are exact theories of classical plasticity for the direct computation of safety factors or of the load carrying capacity under constant and varying loads. Simple versions of limit and shakedown analysis are the basis of all design codes for pressure vessels and pipings. Using Finite Element Methods more realistic modeling can be used for a more rational design. The methods can be extended to yield optimum plastic design. In this paper we present a first implementation in FE of limit and shakedown analyses for perfectly plastic material. Limit and shakedown analyses are done of a pipe–junction and a interaction diagram is calculated. The results are in good correspondence with the analytic solution we give in the appendix.
Upper and lower bound theorems of limit analyses have been presented in part I of the paper. Part II starts with the finite element discretization of these theorems and demonstrates how both can be combined in a primal–dual optimization problem. This recently proposed numerical method is used to guide the development of a new class of closed-form limit loads for circumferential defects, which show that only large defects contribute to plastic collapse with a rapid loss of strength with increasing crack sizes. The formulae are compared with primal–dual FEM limit analyses and with burst tests. Even closer predictions are obtained with iterative limit load solutions for the von Mises yield function and for the Tresca yield function. Pressure loading of the faces of interior cracks in thick pipes reduces the collapse load of circumferential defects more than for axial flaws. Axial defects have been treated in part I of the paper.