Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (1299)
- Conference Proceeding (131)
- Book (43)
- Part of a Book (40)
- Doctoral Thesis (18)
- Other (5)
- Patent (4)
- Preprint (3)
- Habilitation (1)
- Talk (1)
Language
- English (1545) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (1545) (remove)
Keywords
- LAPS (4)
- Natural language processing (4)
- CellDrum (3)
- Field-effect sensor (3)
- Light-addressable potentiometric sensor (3)
- Paired sample (3)
- hydrogen peroxide (3)
- Bacillus atrophaeus (2)
- Biocomposites (2)
- Clustering (2)
- Empirical process (2)
- Force (2)
- Goodness-of-fit test (2)
- Incomplete data (2)
- Independence test (2)
- Information extraction (2)
- Iterative learning control (2)
- Limit analysis (2)
- Machine learning (2)
- Natural fibres (2)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (1545) (remove)
The term ocular rigidity is widely used in clinical ophthalmology. Generally it is assumed as a resistance of the whole eyeball to mechanical deformation and relates to biomechanical properties of the eye and its tissues. Basic principles and formulas for clinical tonometry, tonography and pulsatile ocular blood flow measurements are based on the concept of ocular rigidity. There is evidence for altered ocular rigidity in aging, in several eye diseases and after eye surgery. Unfortunately, there is no consensual view on ocular rigidity: it used to make a quite different sense for different people but still the same name. Foremost there is no clear consent between biomechanical engineers and ophthalmologists on the concept. Moreover ocular rigidity is occasionally characterized using various parameters with their different physical dimensions. In contrast to engineering approach, clinical approach to ocular rigidity claims to characterize the total mechanical response of the eyeball to its deformation without any detailed considerations on eye morphology or material properties of its tissues. Further to the previous chapter this section aims to describe clinical approach to ocular rigidity from the perspective of an engineer in an attempt to straighten out this concept, to show its advantages, disadvantages and various applications.
Suppose we have k samples X₁,₁,…,X₁,ₙ₁,…,Xₖ,₁,…,Xₖ,ₙₖ with different sample sizes ₙ₁,…,ₙₖ and unknown underlying distribution functions F₁,…,Fₖ as observations plus k families of distribution functions {G₁(⋅,ϑ);ϑ∈Θ},…,{Gₖ(⋅,ϑ);ϑ∈Θ}, each indexed by elements ϑ from the same parameter set Θ, we consider the new goodness-of-fit problem whether or not (F₁,…,Fₖ) belongs to the parametric family {(G₁(⋅,ϑ),…,Gₖ(⋅,ϑ));ϑ∈Θ}. New test statistics are presented and a parametric bootstrap procedure for the approximation of the unknown null distributions is discussed. Under regularity assumptions, it is proved that the approximation works asymptotically, and the limiting distributions of the test statistics in the null hypothesis case are determined. Simulation studies investigate the quality of the new approach for small and moderate sample sizes. Applications to real-data sets illustrate how the idea can be used for verifying model assumptions.