Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (1299)
- Conference Proceeding (131)
- Book (43)
- Part of a Book (40)
- Doctoral Thesis (18)
- Other (5)
- Patent (4)
- Preprint (3)
- Habilitation (1)
- Talk (1)
Language
- English (1545) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (1545) (remove)
Keywords
- LAPS (4)
- Natural language processing (4)
- CellDrum (3)
- Field-effect sensor (3)
- Light-addressable potentiometric sensor (3)
- Paired sample (3)
- hydrogen peroxide (3)
- Bacillus atrophaeus (2)
- Biocomposites (2)
- Clustering (2)
- Empirical process (2)
- Force (2)
- Goodness-of-fit test (2)
- Incomplete data (2)
- Independence test (2)
- Information extraction (2)
- Iterative learning control (2)
- Limit analysis (2)
- Machine learning (2)
- Natural fibres (2)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (1545) (remove)
Direct methods comprising limit and shakedown analysis is a branch of computational mechanics. It plays a significant role in mechanical and civil engineering design. The concept of direct method aims to determinate the ultimate load bearing capacity of structures beyond the elastic range. For practical problems, the direct methods lead to nonlinear convex optimization problems with a large number of variables and onstraints. If strength and loading are random quantities, the problem of shakedown analysis is considered as stochastic programming. This paper presents a method so called chance constrained programming, an effective method of stochastic programming, to solve shakedown analysis problem under random condition of strength. In this our investigation, the loading is deterministic, the strength is distributed as normal or lognormal variables.
Limit loads of circumferentially flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels under internal pressure
(2006)
Load bearing capacity of thin shell structures made of elastoplastic material by direct methods
(2008)
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sprint performance is related to lower leg musculoskeletal geometry within a homogeneous group of highly trained 100-m sprinters. Using a cluster analysis, eighteen male sprinters were divided into two groups based on their personal best (fast: N = 11, 10.30 ± 0.07 s; slow: N = 7, 10.70 ± 0.08 s). Calf muscular fascicle arrangement and Achilles tendon moment arms (calculated by the gradient of tendon excursion versus ankle joint angle) were analyzed for each athlete using ultrasonography. Achilles tendon moment arm, foot and ankle skeletal geometry, fascicle arrangement as well as the ratio of fascicle length to Achilles tendon moment arm showed no significant (p > 0.05) correlation with sprint performance, nor were there any differences in the analyzed musculoskeletal parameters between the fast and slow sprinter group. Our findings provide evidence that differences in sprint ability in world-class athletes are not a result of differences in the geometrical design of the lower leg even when considering both skeletal and muscular components.