Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (20)
- Article (11)
- Part of a Book (11)
- Book (1)
Language
- English (43) (remove)
Keywords
- MINLP (5)
- Engineering optimization (4)
- Optimization (3)
- Powertrain (3)
- Pump System (3)
- Technical Operations Research (3)
- Energy efficiency (2)
- Experimental validation (2)
- Optimal Topology (2)
- Process engineering (2)
- Ventilation System (2)
- Water (2)
- Water distribution system (2)
- mathematical optimization (2)
- BEV (1)
- Booster Station (1)
- Booster Stations (1)
- Buffering Capacity (1)
- Building Automation (1)
- CO2 (1)
Cheap does not imply cost-effective -- this is rule number one of zeitgeisty system design. The initial investment accounts only for a small portion of the lifecycle costs of a technical system. In fluid systems, about ninety percent of the total costs are caused by other factors like power consumption and maintenance. With modern optimization methods, it is already possible to plan an optimal technical system considering multiple objectives. In this paper, we focus on an often neglected contribution to the lifecycle costs: downtime costs due to spontaneous failures. Consequently, availability becomes an issue.
Planning the layout and operation of a technical system is a common task
for an engineer. Typically, the workflow is divided into consecutive stages: First,
the engineer designs the layout of the system, with the help of his experience or of
heuristic methods. Secondly, he finds a control strategy which is often optimized
by simulation. This usually results in a good operating of an unquestioned sys-
tem topology. In contrast, we apply Operations Research (OR) methods to find a
cost-optimal solution for both stages simultaneously via mixed integer program-
ming (MILP). Technical Operations Research (TOR) allows one to find a provable
global optimal solution within the model formulation. However, the modeling error
due to the abstraction of physical reality remains unknown. We address this ubiq-
uitous problem of OR methods by comparing our computational results with mea-
surements in a test rig. For a practical test case we compute a topology and control
strategy via MILP and verify that the objectives are met up to a deviation of 8.7%.