Article
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (247) (remove)
Language
- English (247) (remove)
Keywords
- avalanche (5)
- snow (3)
- Aeroelasticity (2)
- CFD (2)
- Drinfeld modules (2)
- Transcendence (2)
- UAV (2)
- t-modules (2)
- 1P hub loads (1)
- Aircraft sizing (1)
- Antarctic Glaciology (1)
- Automotive safety approach (1)
- Autonomy (1)
- Avalanche (1)
- Blade element method (1)
- CO2 emission reduction targets (1)
- Commercial Vehicle (1)
- Common Rail Injection System (1)
- Cost function (1)
- Crashworthiness (1)
- DLR-ESTEC GOSSAMER roadmap for solar sailing (1)
- Diesel Engine (1)
- Drag estimation (1)
- Driving cycle recognition (1)
- Dry-low-NOx (DLN) combustion (1)
- ECMS (1)
- Energy management strategies (1)
- European Transient Cycle (1)
- Extraterrestrial Glaciology (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Flutter (1)
- Full-vehicle crash test (1)
- GOSSAMER-1 (1)
- Glaciological instruments and methods (1)
- High hydrogen combustion (1)
- Higher derivations (1)
- Human factors (1)
- Hydrogen combustion (1)
- Hydrogen gas turbine (1)
- Hyperdifferentials (1)
- Interstellar objects (1)
- Local path planning (1)
- Low-field NMR (1)
- Micromix combustion (1)
- Missions (1)
- Multi-objective optimization (1)
- Multirotor UAS (1)
- NMR exchange relaxometry (1)
- Obstacle avoidance (1)
- Parasitic drag (1)
- Path planning (1)
- Periods (1)
- Predictive battery discharge (1)
- Propeller (1)
- Propeller elasticity (1)
- Propeller whirl flutter (1)
- RAMMS (1)
- Selective Catalytic Reduction (1)
- Small spacecraft (1)
- Snow (1)
- Solar sail (1)
- Subclacial exploration (1)
- Subglacial lakes (1)
- Trajectories (1)
- Unsteady aerodynamics (1)
- Wind milling (1)
- Wind tunnel experiments (1)
- adaptive systems (1)
- artificial intelligence (1)
- assistance system (1)
- debris flow (1)
- eVTOL development (1)
- eVTOL safety (1)
- fuel cell vehicle (1)
- gamification (1)
- intelligent control (1)
- intelligent energy management (1)
- machine learning (1)
- manufacturing (1)
- optimization system (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (247) (remove)
Digital elevation models (DEMs), represent the three-dimensional terrain and are the basic input for numerical snow avalanche dynamics simulations. DEMs can be acquired using topographic maps or remote-sensing technologies, such as photogrammetry or lidar. Depending on the acquisition technique, different spatial resolutions and qualities are achieved. However, there is a lack of studies that investigate the sensitivity of snow avalanche simulation algorithms to the quality and resolution of DEMs. Here, we perform calculations using the numerical avalance dynamics model RAMMS, varying the quality and spatial resolution of the underlying DEMs, while holding the simulation parameters constant. We study both channelized and open-terrain avalanche tracks with variable roughness. To quantify the variance of these simulations, we use well-documented large-scale avalanche events from Davos, Switzerland (winter 2007/08), and from our large-scale avalanche test site, Valĺee de la Sionne (winter 2005/06). We find that the DEM resolution and quality is critical for modeled flow paths, run-out distances, deposits, velocities and impact pressures. Although a spatial resolution of ~25 m is sufficient for large-scale avalanche modeling, the DEM datasets must be checked carefully for anomalies and artifacts before using them for dynamics calculations.
Low emission zones and truck bans, the rising price of diesel and increases in road tolls: all of these factors are putting serious pressure on the transport industry. Commercial vehicle manufacturers and their suppliers are in the process of identifying new solutions to these challenges as part of their efforts to meet the EEV (enhanced environmentally friendly vehicle) limits, which are currently the most robust European exhaust and emissions standards for trucks and buses.
Numerical avalanche dynamics models have become an essential part of snow engineering. Coupled with field observations and historical records, they are especially helpful in understanding avalanche flow in complex terrain. However, their application poses several new challenges to avalanche engineers. A detailed understanding of the avalanche phenomena is required to construct hazard scenarios which involve the careful specification of initial conditions (release zone location and dimensions) and definition of appropriate friction parameters. The interpretation of simulation results requires an understanding of the numerical solution schemes and easy to use visualization tools. We discuss these problems by presenting the computer model RAMMS, which was specially designed by the SLF as a practical tool for avalanche engineers. RAMMS solves the depth-averaged equations governing avalanche flow with accurate second-order numerical solution schemes. The model allows the specification of multiple release zones in three-dimensional terrain. Snow cover entrainment is considered. Furthermore, two different flow rheologies can be applied: the standard Voellmy–Salm (VS) approach or a random kinetic energy (RKE) model, which accounts for the random motion and inelastic interaction between snow granules. We present the governing differential equations, highlight some of the input and output features of RAMMS and then apply the models with entrainment to simulate two well-documented avalanche events recorded at the Vallée de la Sionne test site.
Two- and three-dimensional avalanche dynamics models are being increasingly used in hazard-mitigation studies. These models can provide improved and more accurate results for hazard mapping than the simple one-dimensional models presently used in practice. However, two- and three-dimensional models generate an extensive amount of output data, making the interpretation of simulation results more difficult. To perform a simulation in three-dimensional terrain, numerical models require a digital elevation model, specification of avalanche release areas (spatial extent and volume), selection of solution methods, finding an adequate calculation resolution and, finally, the choice of friction parameters. In this paper, the importance and difficulty of correctly setting up and analysing the results of a numerical avalanche dynamics simulation is discussed. We apply the two-dimensional simulation program RAMMS to the 1968 extreme avalanche event In den Arelen. We show the effect of model input variations on simulation results and the dangers and complexities in their interpretation.