Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (2)
- 2023 (20)
- 2022 (13)
- 2021 (20)
- 2020 (31)
- 2019 (43)
- 2018 (24)
- 2017 (32)
- 2016 (27)
- 2015 (32)
- 2014 (13)
- 2013 (26)
- 2012 (13)
- 2011 (23)
- 2010 (24)
- 2009 (23)
- 2008 (19)
- 2007 (31)
- 2006 (32)
- 2005 (41)
- 2004 (23)
- 2003 (21)
- 2002 (23)
- 2001 (23)
- 2000 (18)
- 1999 (18)
- 1998 (16)
- 1997 (16)
- 1996 (8)
- 1995 (10)
- 1994 (12)
- 1993 (9)
- 1992 (10)
- 1991 (8)
- 1990 (15)
- 1989 (9)
- 1988 (9)
- 1987 (7)
- 1986 (1)
- 1985 (10)
- 1984 (6)
- 1983 (8)
- 1982 (3)
- 1979 (1)
- 1978 (1)
- 1977 (2)
Document Type
- Article (373)
- Conference Proceeding (203)
- Book (107)
- Part of a Book (43)
- Patent (19)
- Report (14)
- Doctoral Thesis (10)
- Other (3)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Lecture (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Poster (1)
Keywords
- Karosseriebau (6)
- Strömungsmaschine (6)
- Turbine (6)
- avalanche (6)
- solar sail (5)
- car body construction (4)
- hydrogen (4)
- snow (4)
- Eisschicht (3)
- GOSSAMER-1 (3)
- Hydrogen (3)
- MASCOT (3)
- Sonde (3)
- Strömungsausgleich (3)
- UAV (3)
- Wind Tunnel (3)
- Aeroelasticity (2)
- CFD (2)
- Drinfeld modules (2)
- Flight Test (2)
Institute
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (776) (remove)
The eVTOL industry is a rapidly growing mass market expected to start in 2024. eVTOL compete, caused by their predicted missions, with ground-based transportation modes, including mainly passenger cars. Therefore, the automotive and classical aircraft design process is reviewed and compared to highlight advantages for eVTOL development. A special focus is on ergonomic comfort and safety. The need for further investigation of eVTOL’s crashworthiness is outlined by, first, specifying the relevance of passive safety via accident statistics and customer perception analysis; second, comparing the current state of regulation and certification; and third, discussing the advantages of integral safety and applying the automotive safety approach for eVTOL development. Integral safety links active and passive safety, while the automotive safety approach means implementing standardized mandatory full-vehicle crash tests for future eVTOL. Subsequently, possible crash impact conditions are analyzed, and three full-vehicle crash load cases are presented.
Handbook of space technology
(2009)
An Interstellar – Heliopause mission using a combination of solar/radioisotope electric propulsion
(2011)
There is common agreement within the scientific community that in order to understand our local galactic environment it will be necessary to send a spacecraft into the region beyond the solar wind termination shock. Considering distances of 200 AU for a new mission, one needs a spacecraft travelling at a speed of close to 10 AU/yr in order to keep the mission duration in the range of less than 25 yrs, a transfer time postulated by ESA.Two propulsion options for the mission have been proposed and discussed so far: the solar sail propulsion and the ballistic/radioisotope electric propulsion. As a further alternative, we here investigate a combination of solar-electric propulsion and radioisotope-electric propulsion. The solar-electric propulsion stage consists of six 22 cm diameter “RIT-22”ion thrusters working with a high specific impulse of 7377 s corresponding to a positive grid voltage of 5 kV. Solar power of 53 kW BOM is provided by a light-weight solar array. The REP-stage consists of four space-proven 10 cm diameter “RIT-10” ion thrusters that will be operating one after the other for 9 yrs in total. Four advanced radioisotope generators provide 648 W at BOM. The scientific instrument package is oriented at earlier studies. For its mass and electric power requirement 35 kg and 35 W are assessed, respectively. Optimized trajectory calculations, treated in a separate contribution, are based on our “InTrance” method.The program yields a burn out of the REP stage in a distance of 79.6 AU for a usage of 154 kg of Xe propellant. With a C3 = 45,1 (km/s)2 a heliocentric probe velocity of 10 AU/yr is reached at this distance, provided a close Jupiter gravity assist adds a velocity increment of 2.7 AU/yr. A transfer time of 23.8 yrs results for this scenario requiring about 450 kg Xe for the SEP stage, jettisoned at 3 AU. We interpret the SEP/REP propulsion as a competing alternative to solar sail and ballistic/REP propulsion. Omiting a Jupiter fly-by even allows more launch flexibility, leaving the mission duration in the range of the ESA specification.