Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Architektur (190) (remove)
Language
- German (162)
- English (27)
- Multiple languages (1)
Document Type
- Article (83)
- Book (45)
- Part of a Book (43)
- Conference Proceeding (14)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Part of a Periodical (1)
- Report (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- 60er Jahre (1)
- Actors (1)
- Architectural Design (1)
- Architectural layered Representation (1)
- Architekturforschung (1)
- Architekturwissenschaft (1)
- Baubetrieb (1)
- Baukosten (1)
- Bauvertrag (1)
- Borehole heat exchanger (1)
Gebaute Geschichte in Turin
(2014)
Peyre, Marie-Josephe
(2017)
Peyre, Antoine-Francois
(2017)
Patte, Pierre
(2017)
Ranson, Pierre
(2017)
Lepautre
(2015)
Impressum | Inhalt 03
Thomas Tünnemann | Unterwegs...am Wege 04
Projekte 06
Annelie Wirtz | Arrivato 08
Sebastian Rupp | Tracce Passate 18
Henri Boh | Terrazze sopra il lago 28
Hermann Stuzmann | L´Ammissione è Gratuita 32
Vivienne Scheidz | IL Potere dei Simboli 34
Felix Keller | Strada Infinita 38
Moran Dorner | Catturato nel Posto 42
Kevin Osterkamp | Vortice 46
Kristina Foidle | La Vespa e il Fico 52
Simon Rix | Sognare Sulla Strada 58
Jennifer Sikora | Strada Pietrosa 66
Sabrina Frömbgen | Bolla di Pensiero 72
Miriam Azzab | Il Momento 78
Georg Mörke | Sentiero stretto 84
Saskia Frömbgen | Nuova Prospetiva 90
Frank Drehsen | A grado a grado 96
Caronlin Grün | Le prospettive 100
Thomas Tünnemann | Flusso nella Foresta 104
Atmosphärisches
Auf die Küche | Kulinarisches 114
Carpe Diem | Fotografisches 116
formine 2010 ... ein Haus ... : Workshop ; Fachbereich Architektur / Tünnemann, Thomas [Red.]
(2010)
Workshop Formine 2015 mit Projekten von Antonia Zajgia, Arnoud Charoy, Laura Viktoria Koch, Kai Stein, Ferdinand Klopfer, Florian D. Heinz, Tobias Scholz, Moritz Gnädinger, Pablo Raphael, Franko Scheuplein, Thomas Tünnemann, René Großner, Anny Phung, Mylenne Jakob-Wendel, Kira Joerißen, Florian Erber, Julian Wesse und Isolde Nagel
Formine Metaraum 2 : Workshop 2013 des Moduls Gestalten, FB Architektur der Hochschule Aachen
(2013)
Herausgeber: Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Tünnemann
Katalog Layout; Thilo Haas, Matthias Funken
Lektorat: Gerd Götschen
Titelbild: Kevin Osterkamp
Fotos, Yvonne Albers | Fotografin und die jeweiligen Verfasserinnen
Impressum | Inhalt 01
Team | Die Besetzung 03
Thomas Tünnemann | Neo Forma 05
Projekte
Carolin Grün | Fare Luce 07
Anke Mannshausen | Tetto Galleggiante 11
Kevin Osterkamp | Azione e Reazione 15
Collin Hackenbroich | Fuori Dentro 21
Lynn Thomas | La Tramoggia 25
Miriam Azzab | l‘Incontro 29
Jonas Wübbe | Le Scale 35
Matthias Funken | Il Laboratorio 39
Moran Dorner | La Via 43
Thilo Haas | Le Scale Vicino 47
Frank Drehsen | Dietro l‘Angelo 51
Felix Fischer | La Capella 55
Thomas Tünnemann | Basilica di Argento 59
Esra Ulutas | Arco Rotondo di Speranza 63
Jana Tillmanns | Punto di Rottura 67
Henri Boh | Il Portale 71
Paul Brüggentisch | Silenzio in Movimento 75
Hermann Stuzmann | Scale Antincendio 79
Atmosphärisches
Auf die Küche | Kulinarisches 81
Carpe Diem | Fotografisches 87
Formine 2019 : In Cima
(2019)
Formine 2022 : Concezione I
(2022)
Der diesjährige Workshop steht im Zeichen der räumlichen Konzeption. Das Definieren und Erfahren des engsten, ganz eigenen Betrachtungsraums, bis hin zur weitläufigen öffentlichen Umgebung des Ortes ist hierbei der erste Schritt.
Hierzu stehen alle konzeptionellen Werkzeuge – von der Entwicklung vereinzelter Skizzenabfolgen, bis hin zur Collage - in den ersten Tagen des Workshops zur Verfügung. Abschließend gilt es, den Aufbau - das „Sichzusammenfügen“ aus Form, Relation und Material - in einer Plastik zu vereinen.
Leitung und Konzeption: Thomas Tünnemann, Professor für Gestalten, FB Architektur, FH Aachen:
Mit Beiträgen von
Miriam Azzab, Larissa Rohr, Janna Steinhart, Felix Reymann, Kevin Osterkamp, Mark Kieckhefer, Pia Bienert, Sarah Schuhmann, Hermann Stuzmann, Silvana Hecklinger, Thorsten, Köllen, Jesse Dilworth, Silke Wanders, Tomas Tünnemann und Jan Waschinzki
Formine 2023 : Concezione II
(2023)
Der diesjährige Workshop steht im Zeichen der räumlichen Konzeption. Das Erfahren und Definieren des engsten, ganz eigenen Betrachtungsraums, bis hin zur weitläufigen öffentlichen Umgebung des Ortes ist hierbei der erste Schritt. Hierzu stehen alle konzeptionellen Werkzeuge – von der Entwicklung vereinzelter Skizzenabfolgen, bis hin zur Collage - in den ersten Tagen des Workshops zur Verfügung.
All diese Überlegungen, Konzepte und Entwürfe werden in eine Plastik überführt.
Sieht man sich die umfangreichen Betätigungsfelder für einen Projektsteuerer in den Publikationen der einschlägigen Verbände und der Anbieter etwas genauer an, so wird man feststellen, das nach der eigentlichen Projektvorbereitungsphase mit Wirtschaftlichkeitsberechnungen und Sicherstellung der Finanzierung erhebliche Überschneidungen zu den in der HOAI ausgewiesenen Tätigkeiten der weiteren Planungsbeteiligten, insbesondere des Gebäudeplaners, also des Architekten bestehen. Geht man nun davon aus, dass der Bauherr diese Leistungen nicht doppelt bezahlen will, wäre die logische Konsequenz aus der vollumfänglichen Beauftragung eines Projektsteuerers die Verminderung des Auftragsumfangs an den Architekten, verbunden mit einer Honorarminderung für den Architekten. Damit bricht dem Architekten bei eingehender Betrachtung am Ende mehr als die Hälfte seiner Tätigkeit und damit seiner Grundlage zur Honorarerzielung weg. Der Bauherr muss in erster Linie seine Wünsche definieren und sein Budget bestimmen. Er beauftragt die Planungsbeteiligten und nimmt deren Leistungen entgegen. Sein Problem dabei ist, dass er diese Leistung nicht beurteilen kann, weder in Bezug auf deren Vollständigkeit, noch in Bezug auf deren Inhalt. Hier steht der Projektsteuerer im eigentlichen Sinne. Er muss wissen, was die Planungsbeteiligten für ihr Geld zu leisten haben und wie er diese Leistungen durchsetzen kann. Letztendlich sorgt er dann aber auch dafür, das die Architektenleistungen, also Planung und Ausschreibungsunterlagen vom Bauherrn verstanden werden. Warum aber kann der Architekt selbst seine Leistungen und damit den Nachweis der Leistungserfüllung nicht selbst dem Bauherrn verständlich und damit glaubhaft machen? Es liegt also letztlich in der Hand der Architekten, ob ihr Betätigungsfeld weiter durch in die Planung und Gestaltung eingreifende, zusätzliche Projektsteuerer und Generalunternehmer eingeengt oder sogar weggenommen werden kann. Die Frage, wer das Baugeschehen steuert und lenkt bleibt solange ungeklärt, wie die Architekten dieses Tätigkeitsfeld des Architekten im Baubetrieb weiterhin nur unzulänglich ausfüllen können und wollen.
Against the background of growing data in everyday life, data processing tools become more powerful to deal with the increasing complexity in building design. The architectural planning process is offered a variety of new instruments to design, plan and communicate planning decisions. Ideally the access to information serves to secure and document the quality of the building and in the worst case, the increased data absorbs time by collection and processing without any benefit for the building and its user. Process models can illustrate the impact of information on the design- and planning process so that architect and planner can steer the process. This paper provides historic and contemporary models to visualize the architectural planning process and introduces means to describe today’s situation consisting of stakeholders, events and instruments. It explains conceptions during Renaissance in contrast to models used in the second half of the 20th century. Contemporary models are discussed regarding their value against the background of increasing computation in the building process.
Architects and civil engineers work together regularly during their professional days and are irreplaceable for each other. This co-operation is sometimes made more difficult by the differences in their disciplinary languages and approaches. Structures are evaluated by architects on the basis of criteria such as spatial impact and usability, while civil engineers analyze them more closely by their bearing and deformation properties, as well as by constructive aspects. This diversity of assessment criteria and approaches is often continued in both academic disciplines in the view on structures.
Within the framework of the Exploratory Teaching Space (ETS), a funding program to improve teaching at RWTH Aachen University and to promote new teaching concepts, a project was carried out jointly by the Junior Professorship of Tool-Culture at the Faculty of Architecture and the Institute of Structural Concrete at the Faculty of Civil Engineering. The aim of the project is to present buildings in such a way that the differences in perception between architects and civil engineers are reduced and the common understanding is promoted.
The project develops a database, which contains a collection of striking buildings from Aachen and the surrounding area. The buildings are categorized according to terms that come from both disciplinary areas. The collection can be freely explored or crossed through learning trails. The medium of film plays a special role in presenting the buildings. The buildings are assigned to different categories of load bearing structures as linear, planar and spatial structures, and further to different types of material, functional programs and spatial characteristics. Since the buildings are located in the direct vicinity of Aachen, they can be visited by the students. This makes them more sensitive to their environment. Intrinsic motivation, as well as implicit learning is encouraged. The paper will provide a detailed report of the project, its implementation, the feedback of the students and the plans for further development.
Können wir Skizzenblätter, die gemischte Systeme von Text und Bildanteilen zeigen, als räumliche und zeitliche Verdichtung von Reflexionsmilieus verstehen? Wie wirkt sich die durch die räumliche Begrenzung des Blatts bedingte gleichzeitige Anwesenheit von Text und Bild aus, welche Wechselwirkungen entfalten sich? Diese Fragenstellungen führen zur Definition der ‚Multidimensionalen Arbeitsblätter‘, die als geeignetes Medium der Analyse von entwerferischen Denkprozessen verstanden werden. Anhand von fünf Beispielen wird beschrieben, wie durch dekompositorische Prozeduren Zeichnungsgenealogien sichtbar gemacht werden können, die intensive Auskunft über Entwurfshandlungen geben.
Heimat entwerfen?
(2019)
Concept - this is a key term in architectural discourse. However, all too often it is used imprecisely or merely for marketing purposes. What is a concept actually? This publication moves between design theory and design practice and follows the history of the definition of concept in architecture, leading to the formulation of a specifically instrumental and operative definition. It bases concept in architecture on its strategic potential in design decision-making processes. In the changing profession of the designing architect, decisions are increasingly made in multidisciplinary groups. Concept can serve as a dialogic instrument in the process, making it possible to process heterogeneous information from a range of spheres of knowledge. The effective presentation of selected information becomes a relevant interface in the design process, which has a significant influence on the quality of the design.
Robustheit
(2017)
In the introduction to their book "What is philosophy?" Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari deplore the inflationary and trivialised use of the term concept: "Finally, the most shameful moment came when computer science, marketing, design and advertising, all the disciplines of communication, seized hold of the word concept itself and said: 'This is our concern, we are the creative ones, we are the ideas men! We are the friends of the concept, we put in our computers.' " This doctoral thesis shares the concern of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, but still, it is a thesis in architecture and thus collocated within the field of the representatives of the "ideas men". It engages in architectural design theory, and refers in particular to the investigation of methodological approaches within the design process. Therefore, the thesis will not contribute to the philosophical dimension of the term, but intends to overcome its imprecise use within the architectural discourse, in compliance with Eugène Viollet-le-Duc's admonition relative to vague definitions: "Dans les arts, et dans l'architecture en particulier, les définitions vagues ont causé bien des erreurs, ont laissé germer bien des préjugés, enraciner bien des idées fausses. On met un mot en avant, chacun y attache un sens différent." The term concept in architecture is very often used as pure marketing collateral, it serves to sell an idea, a product, a design. Its functional applicability is reduced to a special manner of illustration, produced as one of the various design presentation documents at the end of the design process. In contrast, the original contribution of this thesis aims to give a precise, instrumental dimension to the term concept: the concept is the expression of a specific logic, capable to guide the decisional sequences of the process and thus to improve the quality of the designed projects. The motivation to define a specific instrumentality of the concept is closely connected to the issue of interdisciplinarity in the architects’ profession. The interdisciplinary character of the architectural field is widely accepted and discussed as such, but the thesis intends to give a more precise definition of the various kinds of competences involved by classifying them into either the internal or the external group. The traditional notion of interdisciplinarity, predominantly seen as collaboration between architects and technical experts, and, most notably, the historical, sometimes contentious, relationship between architects and engineers is described. Referring to recent developments, the transformation of the architect’s role within the professional sphere, marked by an increasing importance of diverse influences and linked to a growing risk of marginalisation, is illustrated. The thesis describes different ways to adapt to this specific kind of interdisciplinarity, which generally requires the architect’s ability to connect and to integrate various contents, different points of view and diverse scales. On the other hand, the big potential which is implicit in the interdisciplinary field is exposed: architects can inform their core competence, the design, by extracting contents of different disciplinary competences, pertaining or not pertaining to their own professional field. They have the possibility to cross fields of external competences in a selective way and by doing so they can build up a corpus of knowledge capable to generate and communicate guidelines and systematic methodologies for their design. At the end, the analysis of these two aspects allows the definition of a more specific professional profile of the architect as specialist of interdisciplinarity. The thesis is concerned with the theories around the design process. The design process is seen as open to inspection and critical evaluation, with major focus on the decisional sequences which characterise it. It concentrates on the process’ descriptiveness and the degree of self-conscious approaches applied within it. The importance of regulative, strategic mechanisms is illustrated by testimonies taken from a series of design researches and leads to the functional definition of the figure of the concept as representation of a coherent set of ideas, as generator of a project-specific system of rules and as communicator of decisional strategies. The concept's function is furthermore defined as communicative interface which generates and transmits the system of rules authoritative for all the disciplinary competences involved in the design process, a communicative interface which constitutes a basis of shared convictions capable to increase the efficiency of collaboration. Furthermore, the concept's capacity to explore and elaborate the contents of external disciplines is identified as a possible methodological approach to innovative design thinking. The approach to a specific functional definition of the concept is continued by the description of a series of instruments that are simultaneously generating and communicating it. It is outlined to which degree the concept itself is already the result of an ideational process, collocated within the initial phase of the design proceedings, serving as a guideline to them, but still continuously evolving and adapting in its progression. In addition, it is illustrated how all the diverse instruments of the concept are operational media through which the knowledge transition between different disciplines can occur. The considerations about the concept as operational instrument of design are elaborated with regard to a number of examples of didactical applications that are particularly involved in the development and teaching of specific design methods. These examples illustrate the interrelations between design theory and design education. They are derived from very different schools of architecture and diverse mindsets, but all of them transmit models of conceptual design thinking.
Sabbioneta: Atlas
(2019)