Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (38) (remove)
Keywords
- Actuator disk modelling (1)
- Aircraft design (1)
- BET (1)
- Bumblebees (1)
- CFD propeller simulation (1)
- Correlations (1)
- Design rules (1)
- Drag (1)
- Flight control (1)
- Geometry (1)
- Green aircraft (1)
- Hybrid-electric aircraft (1)
- MAV (1)
- Obstacle avoidance (1)
- Propeller aerodynamics (1)
- Propeller performance (1)
- Statistics (1)
- UAV (1)
- Unmanned Air Vehicle (1)
A review of guidelines and best practices for subsonic aerodynamic simulations using RANS CFD
(2019)
In this paper, an approach to propulsion system modelling for hybrid-electric general aviation aircraft is presented. Because the focus is on general aviation aircraft, only combinations of electric motors and reciprocating combustion engines are explored. Gas turbine hybrids will not be considered. The level of the component's models is appropriate for the conceptual design stage. They are simple and adaptable, so that a wide range of designs with morphologically different propulsive system architectures can be quickly compared. Modelling strategies for both mass and efficiency of each part of the propulsion system (engine, motor, battery and propeller) will be presented.
Comparative assessment of parallel-hybrid-electric propulsion systems for four different aircraft
(2020)
This paper compares several blade element theory (BET) method-based propeller simulation tools, including an evaluation against static propeller ground tests and high-fidelity Reynolds-Average Navier Stokes (RANS) simulations. Two proprietary propeller geometries for paraglider applications are analysed in static and flight conditions. The RANS simulations are validated with the static test data and used as a reference for comparing the BET in flight conditions. The comparison includes the analysis of varying 2D aerodynamic airfoil parameters and different induced velocity calculation methods. The evaluation of the BET propeller simulation tools shows the strength of the BET tools compared to RANS simulations. The RANS simulations underpredict static experimental data within 10% relative error, while appropriate BET tools overpredict the RANS results by 15–20% relative error. A variation in 2D aerodynamic data depicts the need for highly accurate 2D data for accurate BET results. The nonlinear BET coupled with XFOIL for the 2D aerodynamic data matches best with RANS in static operation and flight conditions. The novel BET tool PropCODE combines both approaches and offers further correction models for highly accurate static and flight condition results.