Conference Proceeding
Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (6)
- 2023 (30)
- 2022 (43)
- 2021 (50)
- 2020 (55)
- 2019 (91)
- 2018 (74)
- 2017 (85)
- 2016 (71)
- 2015 (78)
- 2014 (55)
- 2013 (74)
- 2012 (81)
- 2011 (70)
- 2010 (67)
- 2009 (63)
- 2008 (48)
- 2007 (44)
- 2006 (53)
- 2005 (29)
- 2004 (25)
- 2003 (22)
- 2002 (25)
- 2001 (18)
- 2000 (14)
- 1999 (15)
- 1998 (21)
- 1997 (10)
- 1996 (7)
- 1995 (6)
- 1994 (4)
- 1993 (11)
- 1992 (6)
- 1991 (3)
- 1990 (2)
- 1989 (5)
- 1988 (3)
- 1987 (1)
- 1986 (2)
- 1985 (4)
- 1984 (3)
- 1983 (3)
- 1981 (2)
- 1980 (1)
- 1979 (1)
- 1978 (3)
- 1977 (2)
- 1975 (3)
- 1974 (1)
- 1973 (3)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (1393) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (1393) (remove)
Keywords
- Enterprise Architecture (5)
- Gamification (5)
- Energy storage (4)
- Natural language processing (4)
- Power plants (4)
- hydrogen (4)
- solar sail (4)
- Associated liquids (3)
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
- MASCOT (3)
- Out-of-plane load (3)
- Serious Game (3)
- earthquakes (3)
- Additive manufacturing (2)
- Adjacent buildings (2)
- BIM (2)
- Case Study (2)
- Clustering (2)
- Deep learning (2)
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (280)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (226)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (192)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (188)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (164)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (148)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (113)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (101)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (57)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (53)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (44)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (41)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (33)
- Nowum-Energy (22)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (16)
- Fachbereich Architektur (13)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (8)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (3)
- IaAM - Institut für angewandte Automation und Mechatronik (3)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (2)
Flexible Fuel Operation of a Dry-Low-Nox Micromix Combustor with Variable Hydrogen Methane Mixtures
(2019)
Flight times to the heliopause using a combination of solar and radioisotope electric propulsion
(2011)
We investigate the interplanetary flight of a low-thrust space probe to the heliopause,located at a distance of about 200 AU from the Sun. Our goal was to reach this distance within the 25 years postulated by ESA for such a mission (which is less ambitious than the 15-year goal set by NASA). Contrary to solar sail concepts and combinations of allistic and electrically propelled flight legs, we have investigated whether the set flight time limit could also be kept with a combination of solar-electric propulsion and a second, RTG-powered upper stage. The used ion engine type was the RIT-22 for the first stage and the RIT-10 for the second stage. Trajectory optimization was carried out with the low-thrust optimization program InTrance, which implements the method of Evolutionary Neurocontrol,using Artificial Neural Networks for spacecraft steering and Evolutionary Algorithms to optimize the Neural Networks’ parameter set. Based on a parameter space study, in which the number of thrust units, the unit’s specific impulse, and the relative size of the solar power generator were varied, we have chosen one configuration as reference. The transfer time of this reference configuration was 29.6 years and the fastest one, which is technically
more challenging, still required 28.3 years. As all flight times of this parameter study were longer than 25 years, we further shortened the transfer time by applying a launcher-provided hyperbolic excess energy up to 49 km2/s2. The resulting minimal flight time for the reference configuration was then 27.8 years. The following, more precise optimization to a launch with the European Ariane 5 ECA rocket reduced the transfer time to 27.5 years. This is the fastest mission design of our study that is flexible enough to allow a launch every
year. The inclusion of a fly-by at Jupiter finally resulted in a flight time of 23.8 years,which is below the set transfer-time limit. However, compared to the 27.5-year transfer,this mission design has a significantly reduced launch window and mission flexibility if the
escape direction is restricted to the heliosphere’s “nose".